WW3 then ladies and gents
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Remember when 9/11 was supposed to be WW3?
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
fuck off memp, stick to playing games.
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
What's this Fucking nonsense about?
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
10 years ago it was China
But I guess it's a good job we have Trident as a deterrent
But I guess it's a good job we have Trident as a deterrent
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Nobody is talking about it cuz Putin and Russia are a joke and nobody gives a shit.
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
[size=85]
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Memphis wrote:Not really

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
you should worry more about bird flu or yellowstone park going up
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Thanks phantasmagoriaphantasmagoria wrote:Relevant thread is relevant:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ?CMP=fb_gu

[color=#FFBF00]Physicist [/color][color=#FF4000]of[/color] [color=#0000FF]Q3W[/color]
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
phantasmagoria wrote:Relevant thread is relevant:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ?CMP=fb_gu
wow. turn it into a gender issue AND mention the current centuryClareLondon wrote:Very depressing to read of the endless, savage, nasty wars perpetually being reported. Why, men? It's the 21st century. Can't you stop with your unceasing urge to dominate and control and, when countered, retaliating by savage bombing?

-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
In other news Adam Curtis has a new documentary called HyperNormalisation
[size=85]
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
^ yes indeed, which i shall be watching as soon as it comes to Youtube
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Hmm I thought I read Russia were having big money issues and were due to go bankrupt.
Imagine if Trump and Putin formed a new Axis of evil
Imagine if Trump and Putin formed a new Axis of evil

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
phantasmagoria wrote:In other news Adam Curtis has a new documentary called HyperNormalisation

[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/almighty1984]Music[/url]
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
more like massive. however theres been signs of some uplift of late, but theres no way they can afford and type of war against another superpower.PhoeniX wrote:Hmm I thought I read Russia were having big money issues and were due to go bankrupt.
Imagine if Trump and Putin formed a new Axis of evil
lol at this whole red top topic
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
But they could afford the war against Germany? Moron alert!!!...
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
oh yeah the superpower that is germany and its army. moron.
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Added to my watch list. 

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
don't bother - that link is no longer available
this one on the other hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87au-Y0AaKQ
this one on the other hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87au-Y0AaKQ
-
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
I watched it. Pretty good but he leaves a lot of context out of certain things and he also is rather selective in order to have his narrative align.
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Yeah there is a certain amount of 'narrative smoothing' going on, especially toward the end where the recency of the events resulted in a lack of processing. the Trump narrative seemed kind of forced, and his gloss on Brexit lacked the distance necessary to say anything interesting about it
his overall story of a world out of control is pretty on-point though, and the Sirkoff bits were fascinating
his overall story of a world out of control is pretty on-point though, and the Sirkoff bits were fascinating
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
I agree about the Trump angle. I thought the narrative threads were a bit tenuous as well, but I figured that was just in my head because Memph posted the link. 
The added insight into Gaddafi, Bashar and Hafez al-Assad's rise to power was worth the watch, though.
Also the new link is bad now, too.

The added insight into Gaddafi, Bashar and Hafez al-Assad's rise to power was worth the watch, though.

Also the new link is bad now, too.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
-
- Posts: 14376
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
I wish there was a more full rendering of characters like Qaddafi, Assad and Kissinger in this doc. For example, they portray Qaddafi as deeply unpopular in the Arab and African worlds but he was very popular at home for a long period of his reign. His third international theory was mocked in the doc but it's actually pretty damn cool (people power). It was implemented too, making Libya more democratic than most places on earth.Transient wrote:I agree about the Trump angle. I thought the narrative threads were a bit tenuous as well, but I figured that was just in my head because Memph posted the link.
The added insight into Gaddafi, Bashar and Hafez al-Assad's rise to power was worth the watch, though.
Also the new link is bad now, too.
There is so much left out of this doc...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/libya-ten- ... ow/5414289
Re: WW3 then ladies and gents
Thanks for the read! 

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 7:00 am