Blood bath in paradise...
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
makes u want to throw a costco door mat over a section to serve as a door for them!
i wonder if theyre smart enough to use it?
the deers i mean ey
i wonder if theyre smart enough to use it?
the deers i mean ey
it is about time!
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
xer0s wrote:You stink...
yea sometimes i stink it is true
i have been known to change my v neck undershirt many times a day!
it is about time!
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
What ?, we all know he used to shag one...plained wrote:whoa ey!losCHUNK wrote:Wonder if gwamps is ok with animal abuse
what makes you say something like that?
the guy most def doesnt seem like he would be ok with that at all imo
it is ok to disagree with the guy and have your own opinions but i think throwing that type of shit around just stinks!
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Just ignore him, he's upset.plained wrote:whoa ey!losCHUNK wrote:Wonder if gwamps is ok with animal abuse
what makes you say something like that?
the guy most def doesnt seem like he would be ok with that at all imo
it is ok to disagree with the guy and have your own opinions but i think throwing that type of shit around just stinks!
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
the actual reason they were removed has already been explained to you, Brian. stop being dumbYourGrandpa wrote:I think some of the children here have weak stomachs, so they determined that no one else could handle seeing the photos.
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
The reason was BS. You and I both know it. Quit being such a rube, simpletan.
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
We all know it's a retarded rule, but you seem to be the only one not able to process the fact that we need to abide by it anyway. It's not a matter of whether the community here can handle it.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
I think it was a horrible post and I was one of the people that reported it
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
I understand the rule. I also understand the rule is "DISCRETIONARY". That means it up to someone to make a decision as to whether or not something goes over the line. So I'm not taking issue with the rule, it's the individual's discretion. I truly don't think anyone from id would be upset if pictures of a deer that killed itself were posted here. Instead the pictures were unnecessarily removed by one person who chose to impose his moral/emotional judgement over others. But I guess as long as you're okay with the people and the choices they make for you, you'll be okay. Just don't be surprised when others who don't agree have their say.Transient wrote:We all know it's a retarded rule, but you seem to be the only one not able to process the fact that we need to abide by it anyway. It's not a matter of whether the community here can handle it.
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Tell that to your mambipambi friends. They're having trouble with it.
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Don Carlos wrote:I think it was a horrible post and I was one of the people that reported it

Re: Blood bath in paradise...
holy shit you don't even understand how rules workYourGrandpa wrote:I understand the rule. I also understand the rule is "DISCRETIONARY". That means it up to someone to make a decision as to whether or not something goes over the line. So I'm not taking issue with the rule, it's the individual's discretion. I truly don't think anyone from id would be upset if pictures of a deer that killed itself were posted here. Instead the pictures were unnecessarily removed by one person who chose to impose his moral/emotional judgement over others. But I guess as long as you're okay with the people and the choices they make for you, you'll be okay. Just don't be surprised when others who don't agree have their say.
thank fuck you're not a lawyer. you'd be laughed out of court - for this, and because of your giant, stupid head
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.
Last edited by YourGrandpa on Tue May 17, 2016 8:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
I explained exactly how the rule works. Tell me how the "rule" isn't discretionary.seremtan wrote:holy shit you don't even understand how rules work
thank fuck you're not a lawyer. you'd be laughed out of court - for this, and because of your giant, stupid head
-
- Posts: 17511
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Actually it makes perfect sense. I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.YourGrandpa wrote:That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.
They are both not allowed but one is far more graphic than the other in nature. You are saying that the dead deer is nature at work, well so are tits. Nothing more natural that the things used to feed the young of this world. Yet you argue for the animal post to remain and we are all pussies for not wanting to see it or it being allowed.
I would also say that this has something to do with me. I like animals more than 99% of humans, so I do find that sort of shit upsetting.
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
You explained how you *think* the rule works. If you think id would be ok with an image of an eviscerated animal being posted on their forums, I'd like to hear your reasoning. Or maybe some examples from other companies' websites. Would Bethesda be cool with those pics, I wonder?YourGrandpa wrote:I explained exactly how the rule works. Tell me how the "rule" isn't discretionary.
Last edited by Transient on Tue May 17, 2016 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
And people would agree with you anywhere other than America, I'm sure.Don Carlos wrote:I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.

[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
I think everyone should go back and read this entire thread. Note how completely retarded it is...
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Dead animals and tits are two entirely different things. The only thing they have in common is YOUR sense of what is offensive. And if you are truly traumatized at the site of either one or have difficulty distinguishing the two, I don't want YOU making decisions for me.Don Carlos wrote: Actually it makes perfect sense. I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.
They are both not allowed but one is far more graphic than the other in nature. You are saying that the dead deer is nature at work, well so are tits. Nothing more natural that the things used to feed the young of this world. Yet you argue for the animal post to remain and we are all pussies for not wanting to see it or it being allowed.
I would also say that this has something to do with me. I like animals more than 99% of humans, so I do find that sort of shit upsetting.
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
quote for the dayYourGrandpa wrote:Dead animals and tits are two entirely different things.

-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
Again, I explained exactly how the rule works. You still haven't told me how the "rule" isn't discretionary. And I'm sure in a different context an eviscerated animal might be offensive. But this deer offed itself in a nature versus civilization type accident. There was no ill intent, no abuse, no torture. Simply documentation of the event. Therefore it shouldn't be considered "offensive".Transient wrote:You explained how you *think* the rule works. If you think id would be ok with an image of an eviscerated animal being posted on their forums, I'd like to hear your reasoning. Or maybe some examples from other companies' websites. Would Bethesda be cool with those pics, I wonder?
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
It's very simple for most people. This is a open forum for people of most ages, posting gore isn't allowed. What can't you grasp about that?YourGrandpa wrote:That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.
Oh yeah, edited twice. Lol.
-
- Posts: 10075
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am
Re: Blood bath in paradise...
I guess you gave up on the last statement. Wise choice.seremtan wrote:quote for the day
Last edited by YourGrandpa on Tue May 17, 2016 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.