Jon Stewart completely destroys Bernard Goldberg

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Transient »

I didn't see it, but it's coming back on at 1:00am EST, so I'll check it out then.
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
Big Kahuna Burger
Posts: 2458
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm

Post by Big Kahuna Burger »

riddla wrote:He didnt destroy him at all from what I saw and Golderg made many good points as well. They merely had a spirited discussion in which John dropped some serious hints for the guy to write about government next instead of celebrities, etc.
:icon14:
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

I just watched it, it's a terrible description... The audience was clapping in support of Goldberg even though they hardly agreed with him... That doesnt happen often.

I do think he made a great point, though... Would we be proud of our culture if we looked at it 200 years from now? I hope not
ajerara
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 7:00 am

Post by ajerara »

I doubt it. Look back 200 years, are we proud of that? People then didn't believe in bathing, for one. They thought it was bad for your health.
mjrpes
Posts: 4980
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 8:00 am

Post by mjrpes »

ajerara wrote:I doubt it. Look back 200 years, are we proud of that? People then didn't believe in bathing, for one. They thought it was bad for your health.
Is that a serious example you're giving?
hate
Posts: 1846
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 1999 8:00 am

Post by hate »

bad teeth too
schlockey
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 12:06 am

Post by schlockey »

mjrpes wrote:
ajerara wrote:I doubt it. Look back 200 years, are we proud of that? People then didn't believe in bathing, for one. They thought it was bad for your health.
Is that a serious example you're giving?
Yes, bathing was thought to be a bad practice to some people. More in Europe actually, which was more than 200 years ago. I think his main point was that we evolve and will hardly ever be "proud" out how we lived before.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

riddla wrote:He didnt destroy him at all from what I saw and Golderg made many good points as well. They merely had a spirited discussion in which John dropped some serious hints for the guy to write about government next instead of celebrities, etc.
He didn't destroy him - the tone of the conversation was friendly - but Goldberg was definitely on the defensive more than we was offering suggestions. I think Stewart pointed out a key strategy of many conservatives - direct your attacks at celebrities and folks with 'false power' instead of really going after those who make the decisions in this country. Granted, culture is always an important factor (as Goldberg mentioned) but I think Stewart hit the nail on the head in his description of the whole situation.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

I don't think he was on the defensive, Stewart got a comedy hard-on and started hammering on the guy from the beginning. Goldberg kind of lost his train of thought, but I dont think he got defensive. The interview really got weird when Stewart actually got serious at the end.

I was going to go back and watch it again, but it's not on their website.
Hannibal
Posts: 1853
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Hannibal »

Yeah, the whole thing was a bit fruity. I bet they had an interesting conversation off camera.
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Yeah, I would have liked to have seen more. It has to be hard to have a winning conversation with Jon Stewart if you aren't on the same comedy/sarcasm level as he is.

He has this way of breaking his guest down with comedy then pulling this seriousness thing to finish them.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

ok guys play it up for the camera

3-2-1 your in
it is about time!
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Dave wrote:I don't think he was on the defensive, Stewart got a comedy hard-on and started hammering on the guy from the beginning. Goldberg kind of lost his train of thought, but I dont think he got defensive. The interview really got weird when Stewart actually got serious at the end.

I was going to go back and watch it again, but it's not on their website.
Maybe on the defensive wasn't the right term, since Stewart wasn't so much disagreeing with him as suggesting he focus on other folks.
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

no tv here - anyone have a link to a vid?
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

[xeno]Julios wrote:no tv here - anyone have a link to a vid?
wasn't a very good daily show interview you ain't missing much.

stewart essentially gently pointed out that the title of Goldberg's book wasn't accurate

his book is titled something like 'The Hundred People Who Are Ruining America'
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

actually, it's called "100 People Who Are Screwing Up America"

Goldberg argued cultural decadence and Steward argued political corruption. I don't know why they both can't be right...
Last edited by Dave on Thu Jul 14, 2005 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

cheers
Nightshade
Posts: 17020
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Nightshade »

riddla wrote:
Dave wrote:actually, it's called "100 People Who Are Screwing Up America"

Goldberg argued cultural decadence and Steward argued political corruption. I don't know why they both can't be right...
Part 2? maybe about Congress? "465 People Who Are Actually Screwing Up America" :lol:
:icon26:
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Dave wrote:actually, it's called "100 People Who Are Screwing Up America"

Goldberg argued cultural decadence and Steward argued political corruption. I don't know why they both can't be right...
Because seriously: What is cultural decadence and why should we worry about it?

Edit:

Oh yeah, the clip is up now on Comedy Central's website.
ScooterG
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:57 pm

Post by ScooterG »

Hello. This is my first post...althoug I have been lurking here for awhile....

I think Jon Stewart handled the interview very well, although I agree about the comedy hard-on - he can't resist doing that to his guests.... I felt bad for Goldberg, though...he looked as if he wanted to cry when he said that he'd just found out that Al Franken flushed his copy of the book down the crapper....

Anyway, Jon both deserved and earned his Peabody Award.
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

Goldberg himself is cultural dung. wtf was with that book flushing joke?
he should be slapped for making a joke as disrespectful as that.
ScooterG
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:57 pm

Post by ScooterG »

I think it actually happened. Al Franken was one of the 100 people mentioned in the book and on his radio show he said something about tearing the book up and flushing it down the toilet...so Glodberg was saying he felt bad....
HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Posts: 14375
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2001 8:00 am

Post by HM-PuFFNSTuFF »

ScooterG wrote:I think it actually happened. Al Franken was one of the 100 people mentioned in the book and on his radio show he said something about tearing the book up and flushing it down the toilet...so Glodberg was saying he felt bad....
i dont think so
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Yeah, like the Koran at GTMO, it won't fit in the toilet
ScooterG
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:57 pm

Post by ScooterG »

I'm sure Franken was not literally clogging the toilet w/ the book...he was just saying it as a public denouncement....
Post Reply