Page 1 of 1

tasty

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 12:07 am
by Massive Quasars

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 12:10 am
by seremtan
if they can do with salmon, then i'll be impressed

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:06 am
by Transient
riddla wrote:I'd probably eat beef again, little risk of mad cow this way.
Mad cow disease is bullshit.

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:09 am
by tnf
Transient wrote:
riddla wrote:I'd probably eat beef again, little risk of mad cow this way.
Mad cow disease is bullshit.
How so?

There's a lot of irrational fear, but the disease itself?

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:17 am
by +JuggerNaut+
Transient wrote:
riddla wrote:I'd probably eat beef again, little risk of mad cow this way.
Mad cow disease is bullshit.
oh, let's hear this one

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:22 am
by Whiskey 7
Laboratory-grown meat could also be healthier, proponents say.
Anyboby see the Charlton Heston movie Soylent Green?

Image

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:47 am
by Nightshade
Awesome, if that works out, we can pave the planet!

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:35 pm
by tnf
riddla wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8964548/

irrational fear? more like prudence when you consider how lazy your typical American redneck cattle farmer can be ;)
No, still irrational fear.

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:39 pm
by Mr.Magnetichead
Can't wait. It'll hopefully keep the veggies and PETA happy and we'll be able to make a big dent in world hunger.

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 7:57 pm
by MKJ
Nightshade wrote:Awesome, if that works out, we can pave the planet!
good point, sir

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:42 am
by Ryoki
Hmm, well, i must say i'd feel slightly uncomfortable eating meat that was never an animal. It just seems a bit unnatural, like sodomy. Yet it piques the curiosity, you know, like sodomy...

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:44 am
by Mr.Magnetichead
Whats the difference? Lab meat is probably better for you.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:00 pm
by Zerofactor
If you ask me, they probably wouldn't solve world hunger. Not because they wouldn't be able to, but if you fed all the starving people around the world, you would then have millions of people who were once starving, now healthy, making babies. Overpopulation. Just like, if they released the Vaccine for Aids, less people would use condoms and more babies would pop up all over the world. Then again, maybe mother nature would find another way to kill us off.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:03 pm
by Ryoki
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:Whats the difference? Lab meat is probably better for you.
I suppose i could expand on that sodomy metaphore a bit more if you like:
See, pussy is probably better for you too, because there's usually no shit in it. But a variety in diet increases the appetite, and probably boosts the immune system so to speak and i'm sure it does wonders for your sense of adventure... err...hold on, i think i lost my point a bit here.

No matter, here's what it boils down to: i would eat the meat. Perhaps slightly reluctantly at first, but i'd eat it if i was hungry and there wasn't any normal meat around.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 12:06 pm
by r3t
if it's processed meat like a hamburger you'd never know the difference anyway

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:58 pm
by Massive Quasars
Nothing wrong with some good lab grown meat, I can't wait.

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:33 pm
by tnf
riddla wrote:
tnf wrote:
riddla wrote:http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8964548/

irrational fear? more like prudence when you consider how lazy your typical American redneck cattle farmer can be ;)
No, still irrational fear.
ok, but all fear will subside once your brain is spongiform.
There can be plenty of irrational fear for very legitimate diseases, even BSE.