Quake3World

I was already planning on getting a new video card anyway. When I built my new PC, just before Doom came out, I tried to get a 6800GT. But I guess I waited too long, because all the online and local retailers were sold out of them. I wound up getting an ATI card (9600XT), which runs pretty well, but has given me some strange artifacting in games (FarCry and BF/DC).

So I've been planning on getting the 6800 for a while, and think I'm finally going to pony up the cash. My question though - now that Q4's around the corner, would there be any reason to wait? Has it been shown that Q4 runs well on a 6800 - or that it runs better on other cards? I don't see a huge swing in the market coming just for Q4 or anything, but I thought I would get some nerdy/friendly advice before I purchased it.

I know D3 runs well on the 6800 - that's why I originally wanted to buy it anyway. So I would think Q4 would be pretty comparable. What kind of cards were they using on the machines at QCon?

6800 gt will dick on a 9600xt from a great height - I got one when they were first out - recently upgraded cpu (from 64 300 to 64 3700) its still got a tonne of leg room (meaning its amazing how much the cpu was bottle neck even even an athlon 64 3000 - i suspect its still got leg room now aswell - its a great card and at £170 ish these days its a total steal

I love my GT. I honestly didn't think the jump would be this high.

Trust me, get a GT and some decent ram, and you will be flying. Nothing touches my PC. The onyl game that ran choppy was BF2 (stuttering) but i added more ram and now even thats perfect.

That's great to hear -- I might just have to upgrade my CPU after I get it also.

I was also kicking around the idea of building a 64-bit system when I built mine, but decided to wait until it was ironed out and the chipsets were settled on.

6800GT Quake4 Athlon64 Longhorn....

I can see where this line of thinking is taking my wallet.

If you wait a short bit rook im selling my 6800GT..

7800GTX here i come..

SOAPboy wrote:7800GTX here i come..

COCK :icon33:

o'dium wrote:

SOAPboy wrote:7800GTX here i come..

COCK :icon33:

lol im still sporting 1 gig of ram.. :icon33:

Total rebuild here soon.. 7800GTX, A64, 2Gig OCZ.. cant wait honestly..

I'm on a 3200 64bit AMD cpu, with 2gig DDR ram and an ASUS 6800GT 256meg ddr...

What i would give for 64bit OS and a 512meg 7800

o'dium wrote:I'm on a 3200 64bit AMD cpu, with 2gig DDR ram and an ASUS 6800GT 256meg ddr...

What i would give for 64bit OS and a 512meg 7800

Thats kinda the plan.. Christmas is comming and well, im gonna be working at the jones store soon, and they kinda pay rather well here..

Wanna get ready for the new OS..

Hell i wouldnt even upgrade my Video if it was PCI E Already.

the fuck are you guys talking about

keeping it real

R00k wrote:I was already planning on getting a new video card anyway. When I built my new PC, just before Doom came out, I tried to get a 6800GT. But I guess I waited too long, because all the online and local retailers were sold out of them. I wound up getting an ATI card (9600XT), which runs pretty well, but has given me some strange artifacting in games (FarCry and BF/DC).

So I've been planning on getting the 6800 for a while, and think I'm finally going to pony up the cash. My question though - now that Q4's around the corner, would there be any reason to wait? Has it been shown that Q4 runs well on a 6800 - or that it runs better on other cards? I don't see a huge swing in the market coming just for Q4 or anything, but I thought I would get some nerdy/friendly advice before I purchased it.

I know D3 runs well on the 6800 - that's why I originally wanted to buy it anyway. So I would think Q4 would be pretty comparable. What kind of cards were they using on the machines at QCon?

in the SP/Q&A vid willits says he was using soemthing made by falcon systems w/3.4 p4 (i think) and 7800 at 1280x1024 w/2X AA and high detail so...

Keep It Real wrote:the fuck are you guys talking about

wasting money.

i would totally wait and see some benchmarks until you buy another vid card. in fact, that is what i am going to do tho i probably wont update vid card til next spring/summer anyway (cpu/mainboard/mem first).

I would get 6600 gt and a sli mobo


that way when the card stops functioning at its peak whap in another (by now) inexpensive 6600 gt and bam you'll be way ahead of a 6800 ultra

[FTF]Pyro wrote:I would get 6600 gt and a sli mobo


that way when the card stops functioning at its peak whap in another (by now) inexpensive 6600 gt and bam you'll be way ahead of a 6800 ultra

Ok I wouldn't do this because this guys an idiot

riddla wrote:for about 3x the money lol, 6800GT's are cheap now

eVGA e-GeForce 6800 GT, 256MB DDR3, DVI/TV-Out, AGP 8x (256-A8-N344-AX) by EVGA
Computers: See all 26 items (Rate this item)
Buy new: $299.99 Used & new from $299.99 Usually ships in 2-3 business days




PINE TECH. XFX GeForce 6600 GT - graphics adapter - GF 6600 GT - 128 MB ( PVT43AND ) by Pine Technology
Computers: See all 6 items (Rate this item)
Buy new: $153.89 Used & new from $153.89 Usually ships in 2 to 3 days

SI nVIDIA nForce4 SLI chipsetDDR 266/333/ ( K8N NEO4 PLATINUM/SLI )
Electronics: See all 18 items (Rate this item)
Buy new: $171.94 Used & new from $162.13 Usually ships in 2 to 3 days




153.89+171.94=325.83


325.83-299.99=25.84


25.84 dollars of a difference between switching


Personally I would switch to sli mobo and a 6600 gt and when that stops performing buy a second.

but hey your cash and I am just throwing this idea into the fold





:icon14:

A buddy of mine just built a AMD 64 4200+ with Dual 7800GTX in SLI, 1.4TB of H/B and 4 gigs of RAM.

Littlte did he know XP only utilize 2.5gigs of RAM... :lol:

He spent $4000.00 USD on that pig.

BTW ROOK, you should get the best video card that you can. Even though the 6800GT will run the games you play now, you should prepare for the future.

prince1000 wrote:

in the SP/Q&A vid willits says he was using soemthing made by falcon systems w/3.4 p4 (i think) and 7800 at 1280x1024 w/2X AA and high detail so...

I assume you meant to say 6800. That's what he says he's using.

YourGrandpa wrote:BTW ROOK, you should get the best video card that you can. Even though the 6800GT will run the games you play now, you should prepare for the future.

Yea, but it's already been shown that the 6800 will easily keep up when I upgrade to a 64-bit system, so I can't justify spending enough money to make the step up to a higher card.

R00k I'll relate my experience since it's so close to yours.

About a month ago I upgraded from a 9600XT (AGP) to an MSI 6600GT (AGP). The performance gain is outstanding.

I was able to bump my game settings up to max in almost all my games (except BF2 cause it's coded like ass).

This system uses:

P4 3.1HT
1GB RAM
Intel 845 chipset


The 3dmark2005 scores were stunning.

Before the upgrade it was less than 1000, after the upgrade it was over 3000. Considering I'm forced to deal with the AGP bottleneck, I'm quite pleased with the increase.

First thing I did was put D3, BF2, Lock-On, and all my other games to the highest settings possible. They all run smooth. :icon14:

Yes. Get one. I love my 6800GT.

They are awesome cars

Cool Blue wrote:R00k I'll relate my experience since it's so close to yours.

About a month ago I upgraded from a 9600XT (AGP) to an MSI 6600GT (AGP). The performance gain is outstanding.

I was able to bump my game settings up to max in almost all my games (except BF2 cause it's coded like ass).

This system uses:

P4 3.1HT
1GB RAM
Intel 845 chipset


The 3dmark2005 scores were stunning.

Before the upgrade it was less than 1000, after the upgrade it was over 3000. Considering I'm forced to deal with the AGP bottleneck, I'm quite pleased with the increase.

First thing I did was put D3, BF2, Lock-On, and all my other games to the highest settings possible. They all run smooth. :icon14:

lol coded like shit..

People always blame the game if they cant run it in uber high mode on "average" hardware..

SOAPboy wrote: lol coded like shit..

People always blame the game if they cant run it in uber high mode on "average" hardware..

I could pick this game apart for hours (oops, I've already done it) solely based on the ill conceived progamming.

BF2 is full of bugs and due to the nature and extent of the bugs, I'm severely convinced the backbone of the game is poorly done too (it has the quality of a bloody beta version).

Doom3 runs better in large fire fights at max settings than BF2 on SP mode just idling.

I don't hold Dice responsible for not being able to attain high performance on 'average' hardware, but I do hold them responsible for attaining at least moderate performance on ANY system (which, by the synapsis I've been getting from the community) is not happening. The game runs like ass on all systems with less than a gig and a half of RAM.

Considering the bar set by other games, they should be embarassed to have their name on it.

They should have realized after BF:V they can't code for shit and just licensed the D3 engine or HL2 Engine.

neh wrote:6800 gt will dick on a 9600xt from a great height - I got one when they were first out - recently upgraded cpu (from 64 300 to 64 3700) its still got a tonne of leg room (meaning its amazing how much the cpu was bottle neck even even an athlon 64 3000 - i suspect its still got leg room now aswell - its a great card and at £170 ish these days its a total steal

Ugh. Stop reminding me I need a new cpu and mobo.