Quake3World

http://www.apple.com/trailers/lions_gat ... large.html

was the first any good ?

Oh my god!...that movie sucked hardcore dick!

ah cool, gonna be watching this one. 1 was good but not great

bit predictable, and swiss cheese for a plot, but good stuff.

Canis wrote:Oh my god!...that movie sucked hardcore dick!

naaah what sucked so much bout it?

i thought it was wicked

losCHUNK wrote:i thought it was wicked

The first one was enjoyable to watch, sort of reminded me of se7en. However se7en was obviously better.

bikkeldesnikkel wrote:

Canis wrote:Oh my god!...that movie sucked hardcore dick!

naaah what sucked so much bout it?

The acting was the worst ever. The idea was cool for a horror film, but my god they need to get better actors and dialogue.

i'm going to pretend i didn't hear this. I was gonna watch Saw this week.

Same thing happened when I watched The Talented Mr Ripley a few days ago, and i remembered half way through that there was a sequel called Ripley's Game, which ruined the suspense.

There was a sequel?
I didn't know that...

I guess im old. Horror movies just play the same old plots, you know whats coming, rarely is anything inventive or imaginative, i just cant watch them anymore.

Mind you i grew up in the day of nightmare, friday, phantasm, hellraiser, evil dead. we all used to love them, so at this point is all old hat.

Now made for TV dramas on Oxygen, thats where its at. Wanna talk about scarey, try to sit through that without peeing your pants.

I liked the first one!

Saw is right up there with SE7EN.

btw..i love the two fingers showing its a sequel

I liked the first one quite a bit. A few plot holes, and the acting was a little under -- but it's a horror movie, not a Shakespeareian drama unfolding. I enjoyed it.

Not sure how they could really do a decent sequel after the first one, but I'll probably check it out anyway.

The acting was at par with grade 3 christmas plays.