Quake3World

Already tired of the golf gti... so now im buying a SAAB 9000 cd 2.3 16v Turbo with leather and all equiptment...

I love saab.. i cant live without one... this is my third saab damn it.

I guess a saabs ok, if that's all you can afford

no, i could afford better cars, but i dont wanna spend alot of cash on a car.
im looking for quality/fun cars for a cheap price.. since i switch car every 6 months i cant afford loosing alot of cash each time i wanna sell it.

this one was fun to drive..
[lvlshot]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v33/chillerW/IMAG0068.jpg[/lvlshot]

I was just mocking YG, saabs are nice cars. I switch every six months, too. Saves money. Gonna get an SLK350 some time in december.

sys0p wrote:I was just mocking YG, saabs are nice cars. I switch every six months, too. Saves money. Gonna get an SLK350 some time in december.

the SLK is fucking nice.. good luck with it.
your in a different leauge than me when it comes to car deals.. im usally in the price range 700-5000 pounds.. that way i dont loose much money when i sell it, sure i could go out and buy a porsche C2 -95 or a phat audi tt or something for 18.000 pounds... but then i would be scared to park it anywhere, i wouldent be able to party or buy stuff much because of the insurance etc etc..

but, its up to each and everyone what car they wanna buy... i wont do a street race with ya when ya got the SLK though..

Swap the turbo for a supercharger :icon14:

PhoeniX wrote:Swap the turbo for a supercharger :icon14:

how much is that gonna cost?
i tried the saab today and the turbo was real nice.. so maybe there is no need to change it?

Probably £1000 . Turbos work off the exhaust output gases so you get turbo lag, whereas the supercharger would be always active :O

sys0p wrote:I was just mocking YG, saabs are nice cars. I switch every six months, too. Saves money. Gonna get an SLK350 some time in december.

An SLK is ok, if that's all you can afford.

PhoeniX wrote:Probably £1000 . Turbos work off the exhaust output gases so you get turbo lag, whereas the supercharger would be always active :O

But superchargers are more parasitic than turbos and have an annoying whine versus a whoosh.

im sorry, but i allso perfer Exaust Turbines Vs Belt Turbines.

Not only are the Exaust turbines more fuel Efficent, they are easyer on the engine simply becuase they will not Spoll to full boost unless you are trying to get up and go ( Some of them DO Reach Full boost, But, this is a little Rare on a Stock turbo Setup Car )

As for the super Charger, the engine allways has the boost at the Rpm Levels and the fuel needs to reflect that the Cylenders are going to be reciving Pressure at all times.

well, i gotta buy the car before i start changing parts on it.. prolly pick it up on monday.

i still need to pick up my McLaren SLR.

tnf wrote:i still need to pick up my McLaren SLR.

I drive a Saab 9000. it's pretty shit, old

pretty identical to this one:
[lvlshot]http://www.maptun.fi/img/Saab%209000_summer2.jpg[/lvlshot]

glossy wrote:I drive a Saab 9000. it's pretty shit, old

pretty identical to this one:
[lvlshot]http://www.maptun.fi/img/Saab%209000_summer2.jpg[/lvlshot]

A CS 2.0 litre -94?

looks nice though..

i'm not sure of the year, but 9000 CS yes.

it looks nice, handles well but it's not as fast as i'd like (dad's new Holden Commodore... zoom!) and because I started learning how to drive in it, the clutch is fucked along with quite a few other little bits-and-peices.

YourGrandpa wrote:

sys0p wrote:I was just mocking YG, saabs are nice cars. I switch every six months, too. Saves money. Gonna get an SLK350 some time in december.

An SLK is ok, if that's all you can afford.

a ford suv is a crappy piece of shit, no matter what you can afford :lol: