Quake3World

http://oliverwillis.com/vid/gibson-plame.mov

He says here that Rove should get a medal if he was the one who outted Plame! Then he goes on for two minutes with totally unsubstantiated allegations that because her husband is a peacenik that obviously means she was over in Niger to influence national policy... Why? Because she loves Al Qaida and Iraq.

When will some brave American take out Fox's satellite? Come on John Carmack! There is a difference between free speech and what they do.

agree

Did you watch that shit?

It's a crime to expose any covert American operative. FoxNews just endorsed committing a crime.

rep wrote:There is a difference between free speech and what they do.

You're right. It's freedom of the press.

No. There are standards that the press have to adhere to.

FoxNews is guilty of pushing one clear political agenda through avoiding reality, reporting lies and half truths, and directly smearing any opposition to the bankers. (read: Neoconservative republicans)

Edit: Do you seriously believe the FCC would allow an all Communist TV channel here? "Next, shocking video of American President George Bush shaking hands with Dick Cheney. Are they homosexually active? Is there some secret message hidden beneath the layers of their gay love? Also, why America is a shithole and Russia is not."

rep wrote:No. There are standards that the press have to adhere to.

:lol:

FOx news is really starting to sound like JAck van Impe .

http://www.jvim.com/

:icon27:

Big Kahuna Burger wrote:

rep wrote:No. There are standards that the press have to adhere to.

:lol:

Hey alt, ever hear of misrepresentation, fraud, and perjury?

rep wrote:

Big Kahuna Burger wrote:

rep wrote:No. There are standards that the press have to adhere to.

:lol:

Hey alt, ever hear of misrepresentation, fraud, and perjury?

looking for the link where the bush admin plans to strike those words from every textbook in america..

rep wrote:Edit: Do you seriously believe the FCC would allow an all Communist TV channel here?

Sure they would.. but no one would watch it

The press can say whatever the fuck they want to. It's up to the viewer to give a fuck and stop gobbling it all up as gospel. If people actually bothered to question it or do research, maybe Fox wouldn't be so effective.

agreed

but sometimes you just have to face reality and understand that the majority of americans are actually quite stupid, as was proved by Bush getting re-elected.

You think the election was real? On November 2nd it was a sea of blue in my line. Guess who 'won' my particular district. The line was talking nonstop about Kerry, and more than half had these ridiculous looking jackass buttons on.



There also was an extremely strong Michael Badnarik presence. There was no Nader support, and no Bush support. I counted like twelve old fuckers who wore golf shirts and had beepers and cell phones on their belt. I could tell they were voting for Bush because they looked like the asshole business clowns type. The rest were young people. (Even a few moveon.org people.)

Edit: I wasn't merely seeing what I wanted to see (Even though Bush and Kerry were both being operated by the puppet masters). I was shocked to see so many democrats (liberals even) in one of the reddest states.

Also check this out: http://www.dembloggers.com/story/2005/7/9/175847/3787