LOL! Take this for what it's worth...
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:29 am
Quake3World
Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
LOL! Take this for what it's worth...
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:30 am
the Jews did it
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:31 am
Theres no such thing as jews. 
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:33 am
orange jews glad I dint said Shambala?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:33 am
also damn there are a load of retard states in the U.S.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:34 am
I've never seen a big jew in my life
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:51 am
aren't jews glad I didn't nevermind i get it now.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:37 am
heh innitHM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:also damn there are a load of retard states in the U.S.
i also believe something like this was posted lil while back with bush - kerry
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:37 am
and those fucking jews 
seriously, wtf ! ?
(50) Mississippi..................85 IQ and i believe everything below 18 is below the average IQ ?
seriously, wtf ! ?
(50) Mississippi..................85 IQ and i believe everything below 18 is below the average IQ ?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:11 am
I thought average IQ was 90?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:14 am
I thought average IQ was 100?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:19 am
This wiki article on IQ is actually really interesting:
EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQDevelopment
It is reasonable to expect that genetic influences on traits like IQ should become less important as we gain experiences with age. Surprisingly, the opposite occurs. Heritability measures in infancy are as low as 20%, around 40% in middle childhood, and as high as 80% in adulthood.
Shared family effects also seem to disappear by adulthood. Adoption studies show that, after adolescence, adopted siblings are no more similar in IQ than strangers (IQ correlation near zero), while full siblings show an IQ correlation of 0.6. Twin studies reinforce this pattern: monozygotic (identical) twins raised separately are highly similar in IQ (0.86), more so than dizygotic (fraternal) twins raised together (0.6) and much more than adopted siblings (~0.0).
Most of the IQ studies described above were conducted in developed countries, such as the United States, Japan, and Western Europe. However, a few studies have been conducted in Moscow, East Germany, and India, and those studies produce similar results. Any such investigation is limited to describing the genetic and environmental variation found within the populations studied. This is a caveat of any heritability study.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:26 am
At any rate, it would be interesting to see the average IQs of other countries to compare. :icon14:mjrpes wrote:I thought average IQ was 100?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:18 am
188 here. That figure is six years old now.
Watching Fox News may have lowered it a bit.
Watching Fox News may have lowered it a bit.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:18 pm
188? You weigh more than that you fat fuck.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:10 pm
Stephen Hawking wrote:People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:32 pm
lol 88 is more like itrep wrote:188 here. That figure is six years old now.
Watching Fox News may have lowered it a bit.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:59 pm
i find it funny how the poor tend to vote for the republicans... idiots.
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:22 pm
Mississippi is full of dumb black people,
i blame the JEW
damn circumsizing idiots
i blame the JEW
damn circumsizing idiots
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:20 pm
I live in CT. pwned? or cellphoned?
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 11:33 pm
never mind the IQs look at those crappy average salaries: $27k max. the national average in UK is about £20k (i.e about $35k at current exchange rates).
:lol:(50) Mississippi..................85 $14,088 Bush