Page 1 of 1
Footage you have to see - Bunker Buster in action. Damn!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:30 pm
by Cool Blue
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:53 pm
by R00k
Looks very effective. :icon14:
That's not the nuclear version though is it?
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:57 pm
by Ray Finkle
R00k wrote:Looks very effective. :icon14:
That's not the nuclear version though is it?
Probably not.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 9:59 pm
by Canidae
They don't make nukes that small.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:01 pm
by shadd_
hmm. wonder what the steel reinforcement specs were on that slab?
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:03 pm
by Don Carlos
shadd_ wrote:hmm. wonder what the steel reinforcement specs were on that slab?
Slim to none?
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:06 pm
by Dave
R00k wrote:Looks very effective. :icon14:
That's not the nuclear version though is it?
You think foreign relations were strained over Iraq war... The fallout from blowing up a nuclear device would probably eclipse even that
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:09 pm
by Dave
.. Ok.. just watched it.
1. it looks computer generated.... eh .. maybe it's not
2. a nuclear device would have annihilated the bridge
!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:14 pm
by saibot
OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm
by R00k
Dave wrote:.. Ok.. just watched it.
1. it looks computer generated.
2. a nuclear device would have annihilated the bridge
I know, I just remember reading that Rumsfeld supported further development on a bunker buster missile that can carry a tiny nuclear warhead.
I never thought 'small' and 'nuclear' could go in the same sentence, and I'm still not really sure what this so-called small nuclear explosion would look like though.
Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm
by shadd_
saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!
fuck man get a grip. someone already thought of that.
Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:19 pm
by Tormentius
saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!
It was interesting and some of us hadn't seen it. In other words, bugger off.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:31 pm
by Freakaloin
NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:48 pm
by Cool Blue
Freakaloin wrote:NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...
NEWS FLASH MORON... nobody said it was.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:59 pm
by Freakaloin
well obviously its a bridge buster...but a bunker buster? unless i see its bs...
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:04 pm
by Cool Blue
You couldn't see the inside of your own eyelids.
Re: !!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:49 am
by Transient
saibot wrote:OMG A VIDEO FROM BIG-BOYS LETS POST IN ON Q3W!!!!
STFU tobias.
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:57 am
by plained
bustin shit up

Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:21 am
by Canidae
Freakaloin wrote:NEWS FLASH MORONS...thats not a bunker...
NEWSFLASH APRON WEARER: No one parks planes under bridges...it's a cut away mockup of a bunker to demonstrate and observe the said bomb in action.
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:46 am
by Freakaloin
hmmm...almost every war since ww1, planes have been hidden under bridges...dumbo alert!!!...
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:24 am
by YourGrandpa
That thing cut through the bridge like butter.
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:11 am
by Ryoki
Am i the only one that's not impressed? Sure the thing cuts through a few meters of concrete, woohoo - but good luck finding a bunker with anything important in it that close to the surface.