Damn, can I have a piece?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:42 pm
Or just a taste, please?
lol
yeh shes not bad
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:43 pm
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:43 pm
I've seen better 
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:44 pm
maybe she break you off some
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:09 pm
Looked at teh pictures from the French Open. This was very cool =) http://msn.foxsports.com/tennis/pgStory ... eNumber=20
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:16 pm
heh
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:17 pm
I wouldnt kick her out of bed for any of you lot that's fo' sho!
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:21 pm
he didn't say she was the hottest thing on two legs.PhoeniX wrote:I've seen better
she IS the hottest thing in tennis though.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 9:22 pm
3-up!
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:17 pm
I give her a rating of nine-tenths erect.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:18 pm
I'd kick her out of bed....just to watch her crawl back in.Dr.FrasierCrane wrote:I wouldnt kick her out of bed for any of you lot that's fo' sho!
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:05 pm
Why is the floor on fire?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:09 pm
Probably because you dropped your J on the carpet, you stoned fucking retard.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:16 pm
So you admit the only reason she'd get back in is because of circumstances beyond her control.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 11:24 pm
Ok...so now after reading this I understand your earlier post.Kracus wrote:So you admit the only reason she'd get back in is because of circumstances beyond her control.
I thought you were in yet another haze of bong smoke and were hallucinating again. But it seems I had the context of your post incorrect.
But to answer your question, no.
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:55 am
yeah, would've made more sense had he included the comma. pothead.GONNAFISTYA wrote:Ok...so now after reading this I understand your earlier post.Kracus wrote:So you admit the only reason she'd get back in is because of circumstances beyond her control.
I thought you were in yet another haze of bong smoke and were hallucinating again. But it seems I had the context of your post incorrect.
But to answer your question, no.
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:57 am
:icon19:
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:01 am
fyi, that was aimed at you.Kracus wrote::icon19:
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:20 am
:lol:
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:29 am
No I'm laughing at you fuckwits :icon19: :icon19:
It's bad enough you can't put two and two together the first time but twice in a row?
It's bad enough you can't put two and two together the first time but twice in a row?
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:29 am
Kracus 
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:37 am
What? It's not my fault you guys are too slow to follow a conversation. Who the fuck else would I be laughing at? Myself? :icon19:
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:06 am
you failed to include a very basic punctuation mark. you have no room to call anyone slow.
go pack another cone
go pack another cone
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:03 am
This is a classic ~ Made my day :lol: :icon19:Kracus wrote:What? It's not my fault you guys are too slow to follow a conversation. Who the fuck else would I be laughing at? Myself? :icon19:
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:40 am
See, you posted again, dummy. That's a no-no.The HavoX wrote:Kracus