Quake3World

its obvious...

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memor ... ntagon.php

The Pentagon was never really distroyed, all the pictures we seen on the building were either CGI or Photoshoped.

Why hasn't someone gotten those hotel workers to talk?

they are under a gag order...

Denz wrote:The Pentagon was never really distroyed, all the pictures we seen on the building were either CGI or Photoshoped.

it wasn't even close to destroyed...have u ever seen the pentagon in real life? it was damaged...

and don't u think if the whole was only a few windows big there would be plane outside the building? maybe not...if ur a moron...

this is the one i was on about the other day. that fight club soundtrack was great.

Everyone assumes the plane hit like a missile.

Planes don't always fly straight. You can actually land most planes at a 30° yaw position safely.

Crashing one, if the nose hit when it was at 30°, the wings would be crushed into the plane during impact, disintegrating.

Better conspiracy theory: Bankers hired Al Qaida to do it, knowing that being a filthy rich buddy of the CIA that Bin Laden's group owed them favors and would work with them, paid off high ranking officials so that they would ignore warning flags so they could have their dream come true, perpetual warfare. $$$

Freakaloin wrote:they are under a gag order...

Clearly...well I guess it wouldn't have done any good without a tape anyways. I would have dubbed the damn tape. Whenever something cool happened at Target I dubbed that shit right away.

rep wrote:
Planes don't always fly straight. You can actually land most planes at a 30° yaw position safely.

Yeah, hi, I just wanted to point out that this is just another reason why you're a complete fucking moron. Please argue this point with me. Please.

When you're landing a plane, if it's equipped with a crosswind gear you can land it sideways.
For black operations they could easily install it on a commercial plane.
Your definition of 'safely' is probably different than mine. You can land a Cessna Stationair at an angle, but it'll be bumpy.

I've seen it done at an airshow, idiot.

Watch out Nightshade, he went to an airshow once.

Really? You've seen it at an airshow? How lovely. I'm an FAA licensed Airframe and Powerplant mechanic, and I'm here to tell you that there's no fucking way you're going to land a plane at 30 degrees of yaw. The B-52 has main gear that pivots, and it's capable of about 15 to 20 degrees at the most. This type of gear is NOT common, isn't installed on most commercial airliners, and the plane that hit the Pentagon didn't fucking LAND, now did it?

:lol: I just called my friend who spent quite a while in the Navy doing the same job you do (But the non DeVry version) and he's been working for the last five years for Southwest and he totally disagrees with you. :lol:

Tough luck.

Nerdshade: "You haven't seen it done! Impossible! I'm the expert." :lol: Deli cuts.

You lost. THREAD OVER.

DeVry? Try Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, dickhead. A cursory Google search turned up a vague reference from an airline pilot about commercial airline gear having some of the capabilities of a B-52, and another statement that the B-52 can do about 20 degrees of crab.
You called your friend...:lol:
So once again, you're not only wrong, but a spectacular failure as well. :lol:

Did I say you haven't seen it done? Christ you're a moron. No way it was 30 degrees. No way.

Nightshade wrote:Really? You've seen it at an airshow? How lovely. I'm an FAA licensed Airframe and Powerplant mechanic, and I'm here to tell you that there's no fucking way you're going to land a plane at 30 degrees of yaw. The B-52 has main gear that pivots, and it's capable of about 15 to 20 degrees at the most. This type of gear is NOT common, isn't installed on most commercial airliners, and the plane that hit the Pentagon didn't fucking LAND, now did it?

That sounds like a cool job. What is your comment about the lack of wreckage?

rep wrote::lol: I just called my friend who spent quite a while in the Navy doing the same job you do (But the non DeVry version) and he's been working for the last five years for Southwest and he totally disagrees with you. :lol:

Tough luck.

Nerdshade: "You haven't seen it done! Impossible! I'm the expert." :lol: Deli cuts.

You lost. THREAD OVER.

Yeah but you lie all the time so who's gonna beleive you anyway?

why would a 757 make a hole the size of two windows then penetrate 3 rings of the building(highly reinforced) and leave no wreckage on the lawn cept from parts from other planes? why didn't the missile system at the pentagon(best in the world) shoot down the plane? why were fbi peeps carrying out something covered in a blue tarp? why why why? u could keep going with 1000's of examples which are inconsistant with the official story...it obvious...

listen to the cnn reporter after his close up inspection...uh huh...

http://www.911wasalie.com/phpwebsite/fi ... intyre.swf

wow almost the same...

The only obvious thing is the official account of what happened clearly isn't the truth.

They're probably sitting on whatever footage of the explosion they say they have until CG models get real enough to properly fake it and superimpose the plane. :lol:
I've only heard one person ever say they saw a plane hit it, it was some guy stuck on the freeway and for some reason I believe he stated he was a firefighter or a former firefighter.
The Pentagon is one of the main points of interest in Washington DC. Surely a tourist... Or a few hundred tourists would have seen something, plane or not. Christ, that's the one most haunting fact... No one is talking.

My take: If they're cool with project Northwoods, then they're definitely cool with whatever they did that morning.

hide the evidence ppl...take it away and destroy...

Freakaloin wrote:

wow almost the same...

not really the same mate because i dont think the attack on molosovics house had anything to do with the death of 3000 americans :lol:

old