Another step down for mankind
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:21 pm
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:52 pm
oh dear
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:00 pm
Hey that's cool!
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:02 pm
I think that's pretty sad.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:03 pm
Why?
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:11 pm
Because I think watching television soap operas are sad.
If you have to watch them even when you're outside the house, it's my opinion that you're in an even sadder situation than the Young and Restless followers.
If you have to watch them even when you're outside the house, it's my opinion that you're in an even sadder situation than the Young and Restless followers.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:58 pm
Soaps will lead to more shows. What if you're:R00k wrote:Because I think watching television soap operas are sad.
If you have to watch them even when you're outside the house, it's my opinion that you're in an even sadder situation than the Young and Restless followers.
stuck in traffic
waiting for a plane
waiting in line
waiting for food
at work
etc.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:10 pm
Yeah basicly what bit said is my reasoning too. It won't be long till we got playboy channel on our cellphonesR00k wrote:Because I think watching television soap operas are sad.
If you have to watch them even when you're outside the house, it's my opinion that you're in an even sadder situation than the Young and Restless followers.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:41 pm
Well that's probably where we differ. I don't even like watching tv shows when I'm at home much.
Before the good old internet came along, I spent most of my indoor time reading or hanging out with friends, or playing the occasional video game; interactive stuff. I guess reading isn't really interactive, but it's stimulating at least, which is more than I think of most tv shows.
Before the good old internet came along, I spent most of my indoor time reading or hanging out with friends, or playing the occasional video game; interactive stuff. I guess reading isn't really interactive, but it's stimulating at least, which is more than I think of most tv shows.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:43 pm
I only watch TV when I'm bored and I typically only watch TLC, Discovery, or History. That is unless someone else wants to watch some fucking retarded reality show instead 
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:45 pm
I could maybe see using my cellphone battery life for a Discovery channel show. But only if I had a much bigger screen, like a Blackberry/PDA LCD.
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:06 am
you can get a vodaphone teevee subscription here.. watch tv on your phone. dont see how this is different ?
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:11 am
Regardless of content, I think the human race is to dependant and addicted to it's television. TV makes your head empty by destroying creativity. The more people watch, the more the become jargon spewing zombies.