Page 1 of 2

here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:20 am
by Duhard
...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:27 am
by seza
Image

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:32 am
by dzjepp
lol... nice one duhy you sure smashed that faggot bot's feelings :drool:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:33 am
by andyman
seza wrote:Image
:icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19: :icon19:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:41 am
by DRuM
30-1 against a bot. Lol, as if even the most intelligent bot has an ounce of thinking skills that a real dueller has.

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:54 am
by dzjepp
Drum did you ever play [100]spite? If no, then shush you. :p

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:56 am
by Guest
dzjepp wrote:Drum did you ever play [100]spite? If no, then shush you. :p
I did. Still looking for the rest of my ass. :icon26:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:17 am
by SOAPboy
let bot kill you
/god

yeah g1

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 6:01 am
by ^misantropia^
dzjepp wrote:Drum did you ever play [100]spite? If no, then shush you. :p
Is the Spiterbot anything like 100.* CPMA bots? I can take 100.Aph but 100.Rat still wipes the floor with me... :tear:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 6:15 am
by Scourge
^misantropia^ wrote:
dzjepp wrote:Drum did you ever play [100]spite? If no, then shush you. :p
Is the Spiterbot anything like 100.* CPMA bots? I can take 100.Aph but 100.Rat still wipes the floor with me... :tear:
Better.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:54 am
by shaft
Duhard wrote:any questions?
I have a question, why are you such a guttless pussy?

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:44 pm
by Testoclesius
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
you need to replace the word "lose" with "play" :lol:

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:59 pm
by bag0shite
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
:lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 1:37 pm
by KlausKinsky
bag0shite wrote:
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
:lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:
dipstick!
more shots=less accuracy.
obviously,this Duhard guy didn't give the bot the chance to shoot.
just like,when your boyfriend cums in your ass,and then falls asleep without giving you a reacharound.
man,you're not really bright are you?
:dork:

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:28 pm
by DRuM
KlausKinsky wrote:
bag0shite wrote:
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
:lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:
dipstick!
more shots=less accuracy.
obviously,this Duhard guy didn't give the bot the chance to shoot.
just like,when your boyfriend cums in your ass,and then falls asleep without giving you a reacharound.
man,you're not really bright are you?
:dork:
Heh, yeah, bag0shite is pretty stupid actually. He never won a duel in his life either. But he likes being a quake3 'back seat driver' and telling others how it should be done. :icon31:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:42 pm
by The HavoX
seza wrote:Image
stupid faggot

Image

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:02 pm
by bag0shite
KlausKinsky wrote:
bag0shite wrote:
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
:lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:
dipstick!
more shots=less accuracy.
obviously,this Duhard guy didn't give the bot the chance to shoot.
just like,when your boyfriend cums in your ass,and then falls asleep without giving you a reacharound.
man,you're not really bright are you?
:dork:
So 45% accuracy is WORSE than 21%? I'll make it simpler for you, 1 hit in every 2, by your reckoning, is worse than 1 hit in every 5. ACC=Accuracy and I fail to see how 21 shots in a 1v1 game yield 30 kills.

Are you drum in disguise?

:icon31:

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:25 pm
by KlausKinsky
bag0shite wrote:
KlausKinsky wrote:
bag0shite wrote: :lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:
dipstick!
more shots=less accuracy.
obviously,this Duhard guy didn't give the bot the chance to shoot.
just like,when your boyfriend cums in your ass,and then falls asleep without giving you a reacharound.
man,you're not really bright are you?
:dork:
So 45% accuracy is WORSE than 21%? I'll make it simpler for you, 1 hit in every 2, by your reckoning, is worse than 1 hit in every 5. ACC=Accuracy and I fail to see how 21 shots in a 1v1 game yield 30 kills.

Are you drum in disguise?

:icon31:
shit-boi...
acc is derived by a formula containing the number of shots,number of hits.
bot shoots only when he has a shot that will hit,
shot hits,but does not kill,can affect accuracy rating.
someone intimate with q3's mathematics should post in more concrete terms.
you sir,are obviously the part of savaant that people do not aspire to be.
:dork:
game ovah,duhard wins again.
:icon14:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 3:33 pm
by bag0shite
lol, posh words too. couldn't be further from the truth tho.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 4:59 pm
by Furtive
KlausKinsky wrote:
bag0shite wrote:
KlausKinsky wrote: dipstick!
more shots=less accuracy.
obviously,this Duhard guy didn't give the bot the chance to shoot.
just like,when your boyfriend cums in your ass,and then falls asleep without giving you a reacharound.
man,you're not really bright are you?
:dork:
So 45% accuracy is WORSE than 21%? I'll make it simpler for you, 1 hit in every 2, by your reckoning, is worse than 1 hit in every 5. ACC=Accuracy and I fail to see how 21 shots in a 1v1 game yield 30 kills.

Are you drum in disguise?

:icon31:
shit-boi...
acc is derived by a formula containing the number of shots,number of hits.
bot shoots only when he has a shot that will hit,
shot hits,but does not kill,can affect accuracy rating.
someone intimate with q3's mathematics should post in more concrete terms.
you sir,are obviously the part of savaant that people do not aspire to be.
:dork:
game ovah,duhard wins again.
:icon14:
If im reading this correctly, then I agree with you.

Example: Game starts, you shoot the rail gun ONCE and HIT them, that gives you 100% accuracy...you shoot a SECOND time and MISS, that makes it a 50% accuracy...you shoot again, and HIT, that makes it a 75% accuracy...and so on...the more shots you make the less the accuracy will change though...because there are more numbers being put in.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 6:39 pm
by KlausKinsky
Furtive wrote:
KlausKinsky wrote:
bag0shite wrote: So 45% accuracy is WORSE than 21%? I'll make it simpler for you, 1 hit in every 2, by your reckoning, is worse than 1 hit in every 5. ACC=Accuracy and I fail to see how 21 shots in a 1v1 game yield 30 kills.

Are you drum in disguise?

:icon31:
shit-boi...
acc is derived by a formula containing the number of shots,number of hits.
bot shoots only when he has a shot that will hit,
shot hits,but does not kill,can affect accuracy rating.
someone intimate with q3's mathematics should post in more concrete terms.
you sir,are obviously the part of savaant that people do not aspire to be.
:dork:
game ovah,duhard wins again.
:icon14:
If im reading this correctly, then I agree with you.

Example: Game starts, you shoot the rail gun ONCE and HIT them, that gives you 100% accuracy...you shoot a SECOND time and MISS, that makes it a 50% accuracy...you shoot again, and HIT, that makes it a 75% accuracy...and so on...the more shots you make the less the accuracy will change though...because there are more numbers being put in.
right.
it's math,pure and simple.
the bot's acc is higher because duhard gave it less opportunity to shoot. when the bot did shoot,it hit and then killed.
duhard simply allowed it to happen.
and then,opened can of whoopass "a" and applied to bot "b".
have spec'd many games when duhard plays...ownage was the result.
:paranoid:

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:30 pm
by Duhard
DRuM wrote:30-1 against a bot. Lol, as if even the most intelligent bot has an ounce of thinking skills that a real dueller has.
Well he's got more thinking skills than you because I only beat him by 29 frags and I could destroy you by 53 frags...you should be ashamed of that pathetic life you're living.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:31 pm
by Duhard
shaft wrote:
Duhard wrote:any questions?
I have a question, why are you such a guttless pussy?
...play me and find out for yourself.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:32 pm
by Duhard
bag0shite wrote:
Duhard wrote:...I never lose...any questions?

[lvlshot]http://cafe.rapidus.net/gira0024/wank.jpg[/lvlshot]
:lol: so you win by 30 yet with half the bot's accuracy. There's a funny smell round here...

:icon31:
It's called good genetics kiddo...the perfect player.

Re: here's the deal...

Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:35 pm
by Duhard
KlausKinsky wrote:right.
it's math,pure and simple.
the bot's acc is higher because duhard gave it less opportunity to shoot. when the bot did shoot,it hit and then killed.
duhard simply allowed it to happen.
and then,opened can of whoopass "a" and applied to bot "b".
have spec'd many games when duhard plays...ownage was the result.
:paranoid:
You sir are correct :up:

By the way, that bot was getting spawn raped so hard that he stopped moving for about 2 minutes in the middle of the game...I got the power to fuck AI hard.