Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:42 pm
Don't worry comrade goof, things are going according to plan...
Quake3World
Your world is waiting...
https://quake3world.com/forum/
bush admits using propaganda...gets applause...wtf?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:44 pm
er..why is ryoki's post above goofs?
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:45 pm
wtf? 
bush admits using propaganda...gets applause...wtf?
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:48 pm
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 5:48 pm
wtf????
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 6:38 pm
no dude...it right there^^^
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 7:16 pm
Without deleting the entire thread? Genius.riddla wrote:stop playing dumb, you just deleted your own postFreakaloin wrote:wtf????
Re: bush admits using propaganda...gets applause...wtf?
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:08 am
You of all people should not be surprised. Bush doesn't give speeches to real people. His team pre-selects "favorable audience members" that would applaude thunderously if Bush announced that he loves the cock....
Loves it.
Re: bush admits using propaganda...gets applause...wtf?
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 5:13 am
Ok, so here's the definition of propaganda.
1 capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect
So tell me where/when do Democrats or Republicans not use "propaganda" to further their cause. Liberals love to scare the shit out of seniors to push their agenda of "the government will take care of you". As an example.
The idea is that each party uses "propaganda" to further their cause. FFS man, think.
Re: bush admits using propaganda...gets applause...wtf?
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 5:38 am
lol, ffs.RiffRaff wrote:Ok, so here's the definition of propaganda.
1 capitalized : a congregation of the Roman curia having jurisdiction over missionary territories and related institutions
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect
So tell me where/when do Democrats or Republicans not use "propaganda" to further their cause. Liberals love to scare the shit out of seniors to push their agenda of "the government will take care of you". As an example.
The idea is that each party uses "propaganda" to further their cause. FFS man, think.
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 6:12 am
Yea, bush is an idiot, but even me, who despises him more than any human being in recent memory, can see that this sound byte really doesn't amount to jack shit. He's joking about it...(although he probably knows there is a fair amount of truth in his statement).
And, as much as it pains me, I agree with RiffRaff - both parties are guilty of shoving propaganda down our throats. Doesn't make it right, of course...
And, as much as it pains me, I agree with RiffRaff - both parties are guilty of shoving propaganda down our throats. Doesn't make it right, of course...
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 7:52 am
who broke the thread 
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:01 pm
of course everyone uses propaganda...but using it to decieve, control and kill is over the top...unless u think thats cool..nm...
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:07 pm
...goof that's the whole goddamn point of propaganda. Otherwise it wouldn't be called propaganda, it'd be called 'educative persuasion technique' or something.
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 2:08 pm
well propaganda was justified during ww2 imo...
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:15 pm
LOL. Sorry to put you in that situation tnftnf wrote:And, as much as it pains me, I agree with RiffRaff - both parties are guilty of shoving propaganda down our throats. Doesn't make it right, of course...
Pext wrote:lol, ffs.
Definitions confuse you? Or the practical application of a definition confuses you? :icon27:
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:49 pm
Remember that the victors write the history booksFreakaloin wrote:well propaganda was justified during ww2 imo...
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:52 pm
you confuse me.RiffRaff wrote:Pext wrote:lol, ffs.
Definitions confuse you? Or the practical application of a definition confuses you? :icon27:
so 'applying' your definition: it was ok for the nazis to use propaganda because the democrats use it as well?
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:59 pm
Counter propeganda is probably the one effective weapon against propaganda from the adversary. Does that 'justify' using it? Depends on who you ask
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 5:34 am
Uh, no. Why is there always someone who goes to extremes and invokes Nazism into a discussion. :icon27: GJ Pext.Pext wrote:you confuse me.RiffRaff wrote:Pext wrote:lol, ffs.
Definitions confuse you? Or the practical application of a definition confuses you? :icon27:
so 'applying' your definition: it was ok for the nazis to use propaganda because the democrats use it as well?
My point was both Dems and Repubs use propaganda and I gave a theme of what I thought was Democratic propaganda. You said "lol. ffs
"What are you confused about? Do you not see propaganda is used by many organizations to further their cause. Thus, the definition.
No where in my reply did I say it was ok to use propaganda, I pointed out that it's common. You're tiring me with your lack of clear thinking. :icon21: