If unicorns don't exist...
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:33 pm
...how can they have horns?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:44 pm
they dont moron.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:54 pm
Looks like the 
is catching.
is catching.Re: If unicorns don't exist...
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:55 pm
If unicorns don't exist then their horns don't exist. Since they both don't exist a unicorn can have a horn.seremtan wrote:...how can they have horns?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 5:08 pm
How can it have a horn if it doesn't exist oh wise one?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 5:09 pm
Because the horn doesn't exist either
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:38 pm
That was my original question, kohaiFlamingTP wrote:How can it have a horn if it doesn't exist oh wise one?
Re: If unicorns don't exist...
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:44 pm
Exactly. A non-existent thing can have any property, so long as it's logically possible. Paul Atreides can be the kwisatz haderach. Frodo can have pointy ears. Duke's girlfriend can have a third nipple. And so on.Survivor wrote:If unicorns don't exist then their horns don't exist. Since they both don't exist a unicorn can have a horn.seremtan wrote:...how can they have horns?
Believe it or not this was a question in an old Oxford entrance exam paper.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:47 pm
wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:41 pm
and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary
ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it
ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:49 am
this forum has a pm functionlosCHUNK wrote:and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary
ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 6:36 am
let's start another tower! 
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 8:27 am
old!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:13 am
Don't start yourFlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
on me, chump.Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 9:14 am
If I get grammar flames from Duke via PM I'm coming over there...Keep It Real wrote:this forum has a pm functionlosCHUNK wrote:and there was me thinking this was qwfix and not the dictionary
ffs if your gunna use grammar flames atleast do it somewhere that may actually give 2 shits about it
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:15 pm
wtf+JuggerNaut+ wrote:let's start another tower!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:46 pm
His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:19 pm
oh, i know, right? :icon31:phantasmagoria wrote:old!
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:45 pm
it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:49 pm
oh christ.
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 6:08 pm
:lol: you sure are, mate :lol:FlamingTP wrote:it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 6:09 pm
Fjoggs wrote:oh christ.
Posted: Wed May 25, 2005 7:49 pm
Actually it's dum-dum, or in your caseFlamingTP wrote:it's dumb-dumb moron. :lol:HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:His grammar is consistently better than yours dumbdumb.FlamingTP wrote:wonderful grammar there Mr. Oxford. :lol:
-:dork: