Created in mspaint - holy shit
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:20 am
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:22 am
that's MORE than impressive. too bad it doesn't come in a bigger res :\
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:23 am
some progress shots:
http://www.deviantart.com/view/18113283/
http://www.deviantart.com/view/18178536/
http://www.deviantart.com/view/18113283/
http://www.deviantart.com/view/18178536/
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:34 am
What the fuuuuck...
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:37 am
amazing
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:15 am
500hrs?
Thats 40 days at 12hrs a day to paint a fucking picture.
This guy has more time to waste then Soapboy.
Thats 40 days at 12hrs a day to paint a fucking picture.
This guy has more time to waste then Soapboy.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:49 am
omg, why? what a fucking waste of time
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:52 am
True
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:40 am
Why'd they have to go and spoil it by putting it through Photoshop?
It is tainted, and is not pure MSPaint.
It is tainted, and is not pure MSPaint.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:29 am
lol... in these 500h some guys could learn to throw out images of similiar quality at 2h each.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:10 am
I didn't get that. On the first draft he says he spent 8 hours drawing what looks like a good half of the picture. So it took another 492 hours to finish the rest of it?shaft wrote:500hrs?
Thats 40 days at 12hrs a day to paint a fucking picture.
This guy has more time to waste then Soapboy.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:12 am
The guy could have went to college, became a doctor, made millions of dollars and paid some idiot to spend 500hrs painting stupid pictures.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:18 am
Impressive, but ultimately pointless.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:22 am
Just like these. Apparently created entirely within illustrator. Technically superb, but considering the ammount of time it took to produce them, you could be far more productive doing something else...
Its a bit like that photorealism art movement. Initially pleasing, but ultimately totally lacking in substance. At the end of the day, it is what it is.
Its a bit like that photorealism art movement. Initially pleasing, but ultimately totally lacking in substance. At the end of the day, it is what it is.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:14 pm
:lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:17 pm
Not tv, pc.+JuggerNaut+ wrote::lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:22 pm
Just like you did.YourGrandpa wrote:The guy could have went to college, became a doctor, made millions of dollars and paid some idiot to spend 500hrs painting stupid pictures.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:22 pm
by whichever means you watch tv shows, it's the same. equating to approximately 1.36 hours a day, most of you fags waste 500+ hours a year watching tv. productive :lol:Survivor wrote:Not tv, pc.+JuggerNaut+ wrote::lol: @ you fags talking about being "productive". i bet you spent at LEAST that much time in front of the television last year.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:23 pm
it looks nice
if it was comercial art i'd pick it apart :P
but you kinda say its not comercial and i believe you, based on the jules im familyar with.
so i say very nice
if it was comercial art i'd pick it apart :P
but you kinda say its not comercial and i believe you, based on the jules im familyar with.
so i say very nice
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:23 pm
on topic: I think that's amazing. Nothing I would ever spend my time on, but simply amazing nonetheless. Reminds me of early Impressionists.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:29 pm
Brisk...brisk wrote:Just like these. Apparently created entirely within illustrator. Technically superb, but considering the ammount of time it took to produce them, you could be far more productive doing something else...
Its a bit like that photorealism art movement. Initially pleasing, but ultimately totally lacking in substance. At the end of the day, it is what it is.
wtf...
those pics you linked aren't photographs???
WTF
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:31 pm
um holy shit!!
http://homepage3.nifty.com/highside/gallery.htm
more photorealistic illustrator stuff
HOW?!?
http://homepage3.nifty.com/highside/gallery.htm
more photorealistic illustrator stuff
HOW?!?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:32 pm
i can't vouch for the authenticity - but the ppl at deviantart seem to buy it...Billy Bellend wrote:
but you kinda say its not comercial and i believe you, based on the jules im familyar with.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:33 pm
and i bet they are all like toxic, young, Dumb, and will beleve anything as long as you use some caps in the sentance.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:18 pm
Thats pretty kickass.
And wtf is up with the illustrator pics? Are they just altered or were they drawn completely by hand?
And wtf is up with the illustrator pics? Are they just altered or were they drawn completely by hand?