John Glenn
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:13 pm
Page 1 of 1
Re: John Glen
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:59 pm
I hate you, 2016.
Re: John Glen
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 10:24 pm
Sad. R.I.P. John Glenn 
There's not too many on the planet of his calibre*
*English spelling
There's not too many on the planet of his calibre*
*English spelling
Re: John Glen
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:10 pm
at least spell his name correctly 
Re: John Glen
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:28 pm
RIP 
Re: John Glen
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2016 11:38 pm
My blue. I was just lazy and copied/pasted from OP even after having read the articleseremtan wrote:at least spell his name correctly
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:09 am
Bummer...
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:24 am
rip
they should bury him on the moon
they should bury him on the moon
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:39 am
RIP
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:17 am
Or in a landfill... Maybe ur backyard...SoM wrote:rip
they should bury him on the moon
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:17 am
He was 95... What's there to be sad about? Grow up idiots...
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:57 am
I'm also blaming that on fucking 2016!seremtan wrote:at least spell his name correctly
(and being on mobile)
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:58 am
So, next to your above ground pool then?scared? wrote:Or in a landfill... Maybe ur backyard...SoM wrote:rip
they should bury him on the moon
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 9:59 am
except he has never been to the moonSoM wrote:they should bury him on the moon
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:19 am
At least he lived a long life and didn't die in a crash like Gagarin. RIP
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:38 am
Is that a pre-requisite?Eraser wrote:except he has never been to the moonSoM wrote:they should bury him on the moon
How about Pee-wee Herman? Why shouldn't he be buried on the moon?
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:12 pm
er, I dunno. I'm sure SoM didn't put that much thought into his statement, but I thought it was kind of weird to honor someone by burying him on the moon while he has never actually been on the moon. Doing that with Neil Armstrong seems more appropriate (only after he's died, mind).
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:28 pm
you can fix it now can't you?obsidian wrote:I'm also blaming that on fucking 2016!seremtan wrote:at least spell his name correctly
(and being on mobile)
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:29 pm
he died in 2012Eraser wrote:Doing that with Neil Armstrong seems more appropriate (only after he's died, mind).
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:40 pm
from ballcancer.
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:59 pm
that's what they want you to think... of balls
Re: John Glen
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:15 pm
Oops! Yes, of course.seremtan wrote:he died in 2012Eraser wrote:Doing that with Neil Armstrong seems more appropriate (only after he's died, mind).
He wasn't buried on the moon though!
Re: John Glen
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 12:13 am
yup he lived it up real goodscared? wrote:He was 95... What's there to be sad about? Grow up idiots...
rip had a good run