Page 1 of 2

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:23 pm
by MKJ
Remember when 9/11 was supposed to be WW3?

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:35 pm
by Doombrain
fuck off memp, stick to playing games.

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:59 pm
by Don Carlos
What's this Fucking nonsense about?

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:50 pm
by Don Carlos
10 years ago it was China

But I guess it's a good job we have Trident as a deterrent

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 8:05 pm
by DooMer
Nobody is talking about it cuz Putin and Russia are a joke and nobody gives a shit.

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 8:15 pm
by phantasmagoria
Relevant thread is relevant:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ?CMP=fb_gu

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:09 pm
by xer0s
Memphis wrote:Not really :|
:)

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:46 pm
by Doombrain
you should worry more about bird flu or yellowstone park going up

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:18 pm
by Whiskey 7
phantasmagoria wrote:Relevant thread is relevant:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ?CMP=fb_gu
Thanks phantasmagoria :up:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:51 pm
by seremtan
phantasmagoria wrote:Relevant thread is relevant:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ?CMP=fb_gu
ClareLondon wrote:Very depressing to read of the endless, savage, nasty wars perpetually being reported. Why, men? It's the 21st century. Can't you stop with your unceasing urge to dominate and control and, when countered, retaliating by savage bombing?
wow. turn it into a gender issue AND mention the current century :tard:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:35 am
by phantasmagoria
In other news Adam Curtis has a new documentary called HyperNormalisation

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 8:08 am
by seremtan
^ yes indeed, which i shall be watching as soon as it comes to Youtube

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:10 pm
by PhoeniX
Hmm I thought I read Russia were having big money issues and were due to go bankrupt.

Imagine if Trump and Putin formed a new Axis of evil :owned:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:50 pm
by ALMighty
phantasmagoria wrote:In other news Adam Curtis has a new documentary called HyperNormalisation
:up:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:31 pm
by Doombrain
PhoeniX wrote:Hmm I thought I read Russia were having big money issues and were due to go bankrupt.

Imagine if Trump and Putin formed a new Axis of evil :owned:
more like massive. however theres been signs of some uplift of late, but theres no way they can afford and type of war against another superpower.

lol at this whole red top topic

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:37 pm
by scared?
But they could afford the war against Germany? Moron alert!!!...

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:39 pm
by Doombrain
oh yeah the superpower that is germany and its army. moron.

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:10 pm
by Transient
Added to my watch list. :up:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:38 pm
by seremtan
don't bother - that link is no longer available

this one on the other hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87au-Y0AaKQ

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:54 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
I watched it. Pretty good but he leaves a lot of context out of certain things and he also is rather selective in order to have his narrative align.

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:04 pm
by seremtan
Yeah there is a certain amount of 'narrative smoothing' going on, especially toward the end where the recency of the events resulted in a lack of processing. the Trump narrative seemed kind of forced, and his gloss on Brexit lacked the distance necessary to say anything interesting about it

his overall story of a world out of control is pretty on-point though, and the Sirkoff bits were fascinating

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:47 pm
by Transient
I agree about the Trump angle. I thought the narrative threads were a bit tenuous as well, but I figured that was just in my head because Memph posted the link. :owned:

The added insight into Gaddafi, Bashar and Hafez al-Assad's rise to power was worth the watch, though. :up:

Also the new link is bad now, too.

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:57 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Transient wrote:I agree about the Trump angle. I thought the narrative threads were a bit tenuous as well, but I figured that was just in my head because Memph posted the link. :owned:

The added insight into Gaddafi, Bashar and Hafez al-Assad's rise to power was worth the watch, though. :up:

Also the new link is bad now, too.
I wish there was a more full rendering of characters like Qaddafi, Assad and Kissinger in this doc. For example, they portray Qaddafi as deeply unpopular in the Arab and African worlds but he was very popular at home for a long period of his reign. His third international theory was mocked in the doc but it's actually pretty damn cool (people power). It was implemented too, making Libya more democratic than most places on earth.

There is so much left out of this doc...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/libya-ten- ... ow/5414289

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 3:54 am
by Transient
Thanks for the read! :up:

Re: WW3 then ladies and gents

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 7:27 pm
by phantasmagoria
[youtube]x1bX3F7uTrg[/youtube]