Page 1 of 1

Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 9:52 pm
by SoM
http://techreport.com/news/29256/report ... c-deserves
On Windows 7 systems, Warner says Batman: Arkham Knight may constantly page data back to the disk, and users are advised they may need to restart the game to fix that behavior. On Windows 10 systems, WB now recommends a whopping 12GB of system memory
:olo:

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2015 10:56 pm
by losCHUNK
[lvlshot]https://s3.amazonaws.com/rapgenius/Crab_jawdrop.jpg[/lvlshot]

I thought Rocksteady was bringing sexy back ?

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 6:36 am
by MKJ
Fucking disgraceful :olo:

Also ithe port was outsourced and not done by Rocksteady.

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 8:03 am
by Don Carlos
It's a quality game on the PS4

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 8:09 am
by Transient
A game works fine on PS4 but runs like dogshit on the PC? Shock!

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 3:08 pm
by shaft
there is a bug when its run on a legacy OS? everyone panic...

p.s. that article is shit

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:27 pm
by Transient
Windows 10 came out in July, over a month after the original release. :offended:

Why is the article shit?

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 5:41 pm
by shaft
Because its clickbait. They imply the game is still a mess in the title but then only state ONE bug from WINDOWS 7 then pad the rest of the article with drivel about steam reviews 99% of which are from the original game release.

Run some benchmarks or confirm some of the stuff 8yo Jimmy posted in his super legit steam review. The article is shit.

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2015 7:20 pm
by Transient
I agree that of the of articles I've seen on the topic, most do use melodramatic titles. So fuck all the articles. I'm more inclined to trust the Steam reviews because of their sheer volume, anyway. If you sort by date, there are a ton of recent reviews and a lot of red thumbs down. Many are 0.4 hours played, but many are 20-40+ hours, too. Most of the negative reviews I skimmed seem to be coming from people having problems running the game smoothly. I don't trust any of the reviews on their own, but there's enough nuance from one review to the next to convince me there isn't an ouroboros of gaming articles influencing Steam reviews influencing gaming articles....

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:51 pm
by Mat Linnett
This doesn't help:
While the developers plan to continue to try and fix the game, there are apparently problems with it they will be unable to do anything about.
Steam Announcement.

Re: Batman Arkham Knight still sucks and more

Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 8:28 pm
by Transient
What a mess. :olo: