Page 1 of 1
some new Serious Sam 2 media
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 3:42 pm
by MKJ
nothing moving yet, though
but, the light of fortune shines upon me; they held on to the wacky xbox hud :icon14:
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_6.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_4.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_0.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_2.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_3.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.gamer.nl/images/content/JaapvanNes/200505/1116429851_5.jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 3:50 pm
by Magnetichead
Fan fucking tastic. I can't wait to get my hands on this.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 3:54 pm
by o'dium
Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 pm
by Magnetichead
Yeah but you know how the sam man is odium.
it might not have the best graphics but I doubt any of the eye bleeders can cope with a hundred or so enemies on screen in huge never ending levels.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:19 pm
by o'dium
Magnetichead wrote:Yeah but you know how the sam man is odium.
it might not have the best graphics but I doubt any of the eye bleeders can cope with a hundred or so enemies on screen in huge never ending levels.
I know, thats its only saving grace. I have SS here and i still play it. Ugly as sin, but nothing beats THAT MANY enemies screaming at you.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:22 pm
by Magnetichead
Don't forget the co-op mate. Mmmmmm.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:26 pm
by R00k
Hell yea, this looks like it's going to be just as fun as the first one. :icon14:
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:27 pm
by Magnetichead
LOOK MA! I'M A LUMBERJACK
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:28 pm
by R00k
o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.
The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:31 pm
by Magnetichead
Because it's how he is.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:33 pm
by o'dium
R00k wrote:o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.
The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:36 pm
by Magnetichead
He needs his fix, what's the guy surposed to do?
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 5:10 pm
by R00k
o'dium wrote:R00k wrote:o'dium wrote:Its a shame its e3... After looking at games with more detail in a hand that in those entire pics, its kinda spoilt it a tad more...
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.
The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.
I normally read every post in every thread I post in myself. It's called a discussion.
No need to get defensive, it was an honest question.
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 6:04 pm
by -SKID-
http://media.xbox.ign.com/media/669/669999/vids_1.html
Some moving media. Also, it doesnt have a crosshair or hud, and the guy playing knows just where to shoot the enemies. So its probably not an ingame real time demo. :icon32:
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 6:28 pm
by Grudge
looks liek a shitload of fun
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 6:32 pm
by Magnetichead
It's even more beautiful in motion. *sniff*
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 7:49 pm
by Don Carlos
AWESOME
Cant wait for it...looks good too
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 9:21 pm
by saturn
R00k wrote:o'dium wrote:R00k wrote:
Man, what is it with you and graphics levels? I know you do texture work, but there is no reason to hold every game to the yardstick of graphical perfection you have in your head.
The original game had nothing to do with graphical greatness, why does this one have to?
It was a general observation. I thank you for forcing yourself to read every post i make, it means a lot to me.
I normally read every post in every thread I post in myself. It's called a discussion.
No need to get defensive, it was an honest question.
He's a cunt
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 10:00 pm
by Magnetichead
When this is out are we going to get some Q3W co-op going?
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 10:04 pm
by Zyte -_-
ow man i loved that fucking cannonball thingy in #1.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 9:26 am
by SplishSplash
Actually, I liked the graphics in the first one.
Those egyptian buildings looked really amazing at the time.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 12:53 pm
by MaCaBr3
Serious Sam: even if the graphics aren't mind blowing, everyone will buy the game just because IT'S SO DAMN FUN.
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 8:03 am
by MKJ
:S why does everything he shoots explode :S