Quake3World

I know I chat some drivel but Jesus Christ I wanna machine gun my facebook wall

[lvlshot]http://www.laughingbug.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/eco-vs-ego.jpg[/lvlshot]

BRB eating wimmin nom nom nom

so sharks and mushrooms are equals in the ecosystem?

and in the 'egosystem' hens and little fishes are of higher order than sharks? rofl
also women and whales are equal

losCHUNK wrote:nom nom nom

om nom nom

LawL wrote:

losCHUNK wrote:nom nom nom

om nom nom

Nice spot

[lvlshot]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/c0.82.403.403/p403x403/44569_490701830961756_479090080_n.jpg[/lvlshot]

That's the whole picture, notice how the panda and lion live together in harmony, and like a Whale has a fucking ego ?

I got a headache, nose bleed soon no doubt

surely EGO vs EMO amirite?

andyman wrote:so sharks and mushrooms are equals in the ecosystem?

and in the 'egosystem' hens and little fishes are of higher order than sharks? rofl
also women and whales are equal

Well, the sharks bit could be true depending on how you look at it. If in terms of genetic complexity, some species of shark may be much less complex than the fish of today. Sharks have been around for about 450 million years. Maybe not the sharks we see today, but it would stand to reason that their DNA may be simpler than more recently evolved species.

Just putting an idea out there. NFI what an egosystem is.

Nah not really you're pretty wrong.

Nothing is "more evolved" than anything else.

But not in like a hippy way or anything. Kinda like how a wizard is never late.

talking at andy many, psyche911 is right about complexity in dna potentially but that's different than somehting being a "higher order" or w/e

Pandas and fucking lions, don't you cunts start

EtUL wrote:Nothing is "more evolved" than anything else.

I agree.
Where for instance jelly fish didn't need to evolve for millions of years, mammals *did* to adapt to their environment.
Doesn't mean mammals are somehow "more evolved".
Just means they took longer to get there.

You can't hug your children with nuclear arms!

Good contribution, MKJ

'sWhat I'm here for.

feedback wrote:You can't hug your children with nuclear arms!

hahahahahahaha

I don't think you get it Chunk...

I interpret that picture as the difference between living in a world where you think everything belongs to you, IE: the EGO as opposed to living in harmony with the world in a functional ecosystem... the EGO side of the pic has nothing to do with evolution and is more about labels and "ownership" or self identity.

i dont like where they positioned the pork

i got trolles

Κracus wrote:I don't think you get it Chunk...

I interpret that picture as the difference between living in a world where you think everything belongs to you, IE: the EGO as opposed to living in harmony with the world in a functional ecosystem... the EGO side of the pic has nothing to do with evolution and is more about labels and "ownership" or self identity.

So it's either a hippy or a dike ?

Not sure when cows owned a chicken either, try explaining that to the Mushroom too

Indeed, because usually mushrooms are open to suggestion.

It has nothing to do with cows owning chickens.

So the pyramid scheme is for fun ?

Pandas and lions yo

I think this is all an elaborate way of equating some people's wives with large ocean going mammals.

e.g.: YourGrandPa

Obviously.

losCHUNK wrote:So the pyramid scheme is for fun ?

Pandas and lions yo

It's just a way of representing how a "man" which is to say a human sees everything else below him as belonging to him. The individuals things below don't own each other.

That isn't to say however that we see ourselves as literally owning these things but rather by using labels to associate with they become a part of you. Like say you like Coca Cola and you like that brand. You might get upset if someone insults coke and that's because someone is insulting a label you've associated yourself with, thus they're attacking your self identity when poking fun at coke.

In that way, that pic is saying those things below represent the man above and that is a classical definition of the ego.