Page 1 of 1

World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:58 am
by xer0s

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:04 am
by losCHUNK
It's a lot whiter than I expected

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:12 am
by GONNAFISTYA
World War Whiteout BliZard?

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:50 am
by SoM
kelso...

BURN!

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:07 am
by Don Carlos
losCHUNK wrote:It's a lot whiter than I expected
:olo:

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:28 am
by seremtan
seen the trailer/clip thing, so cliched. "Ahm just traanah faand mah family!!1one"

we got enough zombie crap, thanks

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 8:33 am
by DTS
Oh, Z for Zombie ... :dork:

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:06 am
by Ryoki
Looks pretty shit to be honest :(
The book is great though. Still can't believe the author sold the movie rights when the book lends itself perfectly for a series, big mistake there i think. Almost as big a mistake as hiring the director they hired. And what is with the stolen/rehashed images from the Dawn of the Dead remake, such a rich source of material and they still can't think up something original? :dork:

I'll still watch it though.

PS fix your vid Xeros you lazy bum

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:38 pm
by Mat Linnett
Meh, fast zombies.
Telling passage from Wikipedia too:
The screenplay was written by J. Michael Straczynski, with Marc Forster directing, and Pitt starring as the main character, United Nations employee Gerry Lane.[27][28] Despite being the draft that got the film green-lit, Straczynski's script was tossed aside, so that production, which was to begin at the start of 2009, was delayed while the script was completely re-written by Matthew Michael Carnahan to set the movie in the present, leaving behind much of the premise of the book to make it more of an action film.
I don't quite understand that. I thought Pitt had read the book and loved the premise, yet this appears to be substantially different.

Eh, I'll probably still watch it, but I'll view it as a completely different intellectual property.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:12 pm
by xer0s
Ryoki wrote: PS fix your vid Xeros you lazy bum
:confused:

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 1:24 pm
by phantasmagoria
It's a shame that it's turned into a bit of a generic zombie film. The piles of bodies look good and I'll enjoy it but it's a total waste of Brooks' IP. Oh well.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:41 pm
by Captain
xer0s wrote:
Ryoki wrote: PS fix your vid Xeros you lazy bum
:confused:
Retard.


Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:18 pm
by Transient
Fast zombies are not zombies IMO. I enjoyed the book but this looks nothing like it. :(

Re: World War Z

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:22 pm
by Whiskey 7
xer0s wrote:
Ryoki wrote: PS fix your vid Xeros you lazy bum
:confused:
Thank you Captain Mazda :up:

Look to be an interesting movie....googled for a release date
World War Z is due to be released on June 21, 2013.
source

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:05 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Transient wrote:Fast zombies are not zombies IMO.
fuck u...

Slow, lumbering zombies aren't scary at all. They never were. The only time they're scary is in overwhelming hordes, and even then not that scary.

Fast zombies are the shit because, like the slow zombies, their only desire is to eat your face and you'll never outrun something that goes flat out and never gets tired. Besides...IRL fast zombies would be harder, if not impossible, to get headshots on when you're in panic mode.

There is no panic mode with slow zombies....like....ever.












































Fag.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:07 am
by GONNAFISTYA
As for the trailer it looks insanely retarded, but Brad Pitt rarely works on shit projects, so maybe it'll be better than most people hope.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 1:57 am
by seremtan
yeah i used to think the presence of harrison ford in a movie meant it was good, but then he did sabrina so that was that hypothesis out the fucking door

also related: de niro

at some point in an actor's career, it just becomes about the money

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:03 am
by GONNAFISTYA
Or they're just bored. I doubt Harrison Ford or Brad Pitt actually want or need more cash.

Benjamin Button was a wash, so Mr.Pitt's record isn't spotless, but I doubt it'll be as monumentally retarded as the Resident Evil zombie action.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:32 pm
by Transient
GONNAFISTYA wrote:
Transient wrote:Fast zombies are not zombies IMO.
fuck u...

Slow, lumbering zombies aren't scary at all. They never were.
That why all the slow zombie movies up until now were terrible, right? The unfeeling, unwavering certainty of a slow zombie approach is scary and works well in film. In real life I'm sure it would be different, and the more zombies there are, the scarier. Once they can run it just becomes a movie about being chased by someone. I will admit, though, that 28 Days Later did it well. Fast zombies make for good video games, too, as we all know.

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:33 pm
by plained
losCHUNK wrote:It's a lot whiter than I expected

heheee

Re: World War Z

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:36 pm
by plained
looks spec'able for sure