Quake3World

First Kerbal to land on the Mun, dead at 82.

RIP

Any man who'd be willing to ride a rocket has massive balls.

RIP professional actor.

He had at least 10 years left. He was about to tell the world what really happened on the "moon". Tired of keeping it all in over all these years. They let him go early.

^ too soon

RIP

Lol he never went!...

He was, and still is, one of my heroes.

To all saying the moon landing was a fake: tell that to Buzz Aldrin... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wcrkxOgzhU

Goodnight, sweet prince

GONNAFISTYA wrote:RIP

Any man who'd be willing to ride a rocket has massive balls.

.... and land on that small sphere so far away 40+ years ago

R.I.P. Neil Armstrong

RIP, sir.

He was a man who will be remembered, he made it into the history books.

Although I always wonder why people always keep saying R.I.P., even on a forum where the majority, if not all, are atheists.

His body is soon to be burned or burried, and in both cases will be reduced to a degraded, or degrading form of a rubble of carbon molecules.

rip makes me feel he actually has a soul still flying out there somewhere.

...and don't start with me by saying , It's just a matter of speech...

Because it is a figure of speech, much like "oh my god" and "jesus fucking christ you're pathetic".

Insensatez wrote:He was a man who will be remembered, he made it into the history books.

Although I always wonder why people always keep saying R.I.P., even on a forum where the majority, if not all, are atheists.

His body is soon to be burned or burried, and in both cases will be reduced to a degraded, or degrading form of a rubble of carbon molecules.

rip makes me feel he actually has a soul still flying out there somewhere.

...and don't start with me by saying , It's just a matter of speech...

May his carbon molecules be absorbed into something with a relatively peaceful existence in the universe?

Captain Mazda wrote:Because it is a figure of speech, much like "oh my god" and "jesus fucking christ you're pathetic".

I won't use either of them, because when I swear, it's in my own dialect, which would be roughly translated to "my fucking balls", or "this feels fucking nice".

As for Armstrong, I'd say something about his accomplishments and say that he'll be remembered and missed.

Thanks for correcting me on the phrase figure of speech though.

feedback wrote:
May his carbon molecules be absorbed into something with a relatively peaceful existence in the universe?

I'm still trying to figure out what's peaceful about a rotting body or burning corpse...

Insensatez wrote:I'm still trying to figure out what's peaceful about a rotting body or burning corpse...

Hopefully you'll find out soon enough.

In that case I won't , wouldn't I...

Insensatez wrote:He was a man who will be remembered, he made it into the history books.

Although I always wonder why people always keep saying R.I.P., even on a forum where the majority, if not all, are atheists.

His body is soon to be burned or burried, and in both cases will be reduced to a degraded, or degrading form of a rubble of carbon molecules.

rip makes me feel he actually has a soul still flying out there somewhere.

...and don't start with me by saying , It's just a matter of speech...

It's been used for 1000+ years, it was originally used by the Catholic church as part of burial rites, but over the last 1000 years, it has passed into common parlance and is now used idiomatically.

Are you one of those people who cuntishly answers "Why are you sorry?" when someone says they're sorry to hear about your bad news?

Most people either don't know enough about the person, or don't have the creative capacity to form a completely new and poignant statement to eulogise someone, or simply don't care enough, but still feel compelled to show a modicum of respect to the deceased. Hence, 'Rest In Peace'.

Insensatez wrote:

feedback wrote:
May his carbon molecules be absorbed into something with a relatively peaceful existence in the universe?

I'm still trying to figure out what's peaceful about a rotting body or burning corpse...

This is roughly as stupid as someone saying the stars look so peaceful in the night sky, and then you saying you fail to see what's peaceful about a violent billion-degree nuclear fusion reactor heading towards the most cataclysmic destructive oblivion capable in the physical world.

Or, you could go deeper and point out the soft music that relaxes someone surely can't be relaxing, because what's relaxing about shards of sound spearing into the holes in the side of your head and penetrating your brain?

0psys wrote:
This is roughly as stupid as someone saying the stars look so peaceful in the night sky, and then you saying you fail to see what's peaceful about a violent billion-degree nuclear fusion reactor heading towards the most cataclysmic destructive oblivion capable in the physical world.

Or, you could go deeper and point out the soft music that relaxes someone surely can't be relaxing, because what's relaxing about shards of sound spearing into the holes in the side of your head and penetrating your brain?

Or you are totally missing my point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_in_peace

It has a religious background, has nothing to do with stars or music, and yet it keeps on getting used for some spirit that may or may not find a pieceful place in another life.

A pioneer and inspiration to millions. I have immense respect for people who believe in pushing far beyond borders like that. It's refreshing to hear from such people between all the cynical morons that inhabit this planet.

First man to allegedly walk on the moon...where's the proof?...

That's what I thought...next...

Insensatez wrote: Or you are totally missing my point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_in_peace

It has a religious background, has nothing to do with stars or music, and yet it keeps on getting used for some spirit that may or may not find a pieceful place in another life.

No, I get your point, I'm making a separate one that you're an idiot.

You see the part where I said "idiomatically"? That's the part what answers your query. The etymology is meaningless, because it's now an idiom. It has no religious connotation anymore, and any time it does, it's merely secondary to the primary act of expressing condolences.

If you know what a phrase or idiom is, then there's absolutely nothing to be confused about here.

0psys wrote:
No, I get your point, I'm making a separate one that you're an idiot.

You see the part where I said "idiomatically"? That's the part what answers your query. The etymology is meaningless, because it's now an idiom. It has no religious connotation anymore, and any time it does, it's merely secondary to the primary act of expressing condolences.

If you know what a phrase or idiom is, then there's absolutely nothing to be confused about here.

For you and me , it may well be. For many of the people that beside the grave of their beloved one, that same phrase has not lost its ethymology, because they still believe that saying "May he rest in piece" refers to his spirit moving to another place where his soul can have an eternal life.

How many people do you know that still say: "For Thor's sake" or "In the name of Zeus"?

If we stop using expressions of condolences like these for a couple of hundreds , maybe thousands of years, things might change for the better.

If I wan't to express condolences to a family member of someone who had just died or is about to be burried , I prefer to say something in the lines of "I've learned alot from him, he always made me laugh, and I will miss him"