Quake3World

lol Quick Time, no thx.

I thought they scrapped bond?

It's embedded you massive greek

Tsakali wrote:lol Quick Time, no thx.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24mTIE4D9JM

oh look, another bond movie to watch and then immediately forget, like quantum of bollocks

I saw the trailer for this last week and immediately came to the conclusion that the new Bond movies aren't worth watching....like...at all.

The reason is simple: they aren't James Bond movies. Call it whatever you like, but there's nothing 007 about the franchise reboot. It deserves to either go away and die or just name it something else. If they weren't sold as James Bond movies I probably wouldn't despise them as much as I do due to roughly 30 years of expectations of what a James Bond movie is and who James Bond the character is.

Seriously...just rename it, break off all ties to the "Bond Brand" and people will probably enjoy it more.

^ This. They took Bourne and 007, put it in a shaker and served with a lime peel sliced thin, only to find that it turned out shit because they forgot the 007.

More like Skyfail amirite?!

It's just a goddam movie you weeping cunts.

i'd rather the shallow gadget using, cheesy punchline droppin womanizer than this boring cunt of a reboot.

I say, bring back doomsday death-rays and ice layers build on top of active volcanoes kind of entertainment.

i think its because the new focus for bond movies is on the female audience...

I wonder what kind of people actually look forward to the new Bond movies, i've found each one utterly dull and forgettable.

Remember watching QoS like a month ago and the next day i couldn't remember the first thing about it... not what it was about, not if the acting was any good, if there were many explosions, nothing. For all i know i might have been staring at a wall for an hour and a half.

All I remember is some parkour guy and a series of tubes .

obsidian wrote:^ This. They took Bourne and 007, put it in a shaker and served with a lime peel sliced thin, only to find that it turned out shit because they forgot the 007.

Bourne > 007

by a mile

Bourne could kick Bond's ass while fucking Eraser's dad.

Ryoki wrote:Remember watching QoS like a month ago and the next day i couldn't remember the first thing about it... not what it was about, not if the acting was any good, if there were many explosions, nothing. For all i know i might have been staring at a wall for an hour and a half.

exactly this

watching a bond movie these days is like watching traffic: everything's shiny and fast and noisy, and instantly forgettable

Captain Mazda wrote:Bourne could kick Bond's ass while fucking Eraser's dad.

i think that actually happens in the next Bourne movie

The Bourne Sodomy

trailer sure didnt get me interested

Wait, Jason Bourne is Lawl?

seremtan wrote:i think that actually happens in the next Bourne movie

The Bourne Sodomy

Closefully followed by "The Bourne Necrophily" to neatly wrap up this sweaty pentalogy

They have officially fucked the legacy of Bond...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... 38935.html

you mean to say movie-making is just a business venture for the purposes of making money, whether through ticket sales, merchandising or sponsorship deals?

holy fucking revelations, batman

xer0s wrote:They have officially fucked the legacy of Bond...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... 38935.html

yeah, because there were *never* any product placements in the old movies.

menkent wrote:

xer0s wrote:They have officially fucked the legacy of Bond...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... 38935.html

yeah, because there were *never* any product placements in the old movies.

I think he's talking about Bond abandoning his usual "Vodka martini...shaken, not stirred."

TBH it's not a horrible thing to happen, since it makes it that much less a Bond film and I can view it as a mindless, blurry action film.