Page 1 of 1
Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:37 am
by Deathshroud
So, is there any reason why this forum isn't registered on tapatalk?
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:48 am
by EtUL
i looked up tapatalk because some other forum kept bugging me about it and it does weird shit like run all traffic thru them.
also the administration doesn't care about this place cause there's like 20 of us.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:56 am
by MKJ
Yes, its not a matter of simply installing an app.
We're better off with a mobile css anyway. Obviously that requires some effort from DooMer.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:02 am
by Eraser
MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.

Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:50 am
by U4EA
The regular site already works fine on any recent smartphone .. ?!?!
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:33 pm
by Mogul
I use Tapatalk for a couple of other forums and it is a much higher-quality experience than merely browsing the normal site on a mobile phone. I highly recommend getting this forum on Tapatalk.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:04 pm
by Tsakali
U4EA wrote:The regular site already works fine on any recent smartphone .. ?!?!
on an android, when you zoom in, you can have it to where you can read the replies but you'll have to scroll sideways to see the col. that houses the posters info...and there is some humor points to that as you can pretty much guess most of the time who it is whithout scrolling... font colors help though.
So even though, it's 'ok' it could be much better.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:52 pm
by Dark Metal
Eraser wrote:MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.

I also blue smiley faced.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 6:41 am
by Big Kahuna Burger
Eraser wrote:MKJ wrote:effort
MKJ wrote:DooMer.

some people work 40 hours a week. also, pretty sure I posted a link to a phpbb plugin that renders the site for a mobile view in irc like 40 years ago.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:04 am
by Whiskey 7
Deathshroud wrote:So, is there any reason why this forum isn't registered on tapatalk?
Tapatalk?
googles.... Oh an app for a smartphone
I might have to update my
brick

Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:34 am
by MKJ
Tsakali wrote:
on an android, when you zoom in, you can have it to where you can read the replies but you'll have to scroll sideways to see the col. that houses the posters info...and there is some humor points to that as you can pretty much guess most of the time who it is whithout scrolling... font colors help though.
So even though, it's 'ok' it could be much better.
yes. the reply box also doesnt quite fit nor works very well.
its also slow as fuck

Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:05 am
by Eraser
Big Kahuna Burger wrote:some people work 40 hours a week.
Yes. Some people. People like me.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:21 am
by Ryoki
Worked 40 hours a week for years, now 36 hours, which is considered full time here. It's pretty awesome and i wouldn't want to go back to 40, fuck no

Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:32 am
by Whiskey 7
Ryoki wrote:Worked 40 hours a week for years, now 36 hours, which is considered full time here. It's pretty awesome and i wouldn't want to go back to 40, fuck no

Believe I work 36.25 hours but as
flextime.
Don't know if you people have it in your workplace, if you work

for a living but with
flextime I am able to save time every day up to an hour or so and have a day off every 2 weeks (as I please with higher appoval - they don't often say no)
It works both ways but the boss/Manager/Team Leader really like to have all bums on seats every day.
Note: I did say bums
OT: Still thinking ... will I buy one of these smart phones soon?
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:10 pm
by Deathshroud
Mogul wrote:I use Tapatalk for a couple of other forums and it is a much higher-quality experience than merely browsing the normal site on a mobile phone. I highly recommend getting this forum on Tapatalk.
This is what I'm sayin
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:34 pm
by Eraser
Just downloaded the Chrome beta for ICS (Android 4). It's truly great. Much faster than the default browser. It also sizes Q3W very nicely in both portrait and landscape orientation. It shows the bar with usernames/icons together with post contents with text being very well readable.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:20 pm
by Doombrain
Eraser wrote:Just downloaded the Chrome beta for ICS (Android 4). It's truly great. Much faster than the default browser. It also sizes Q3W very nicely in both portrait and landscape orientation. It shows the bar with usernames/icons together with post contents with text being very well readable.
Does flash work for you?
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:26 pm
by Eraser
I'm not sure. YouTube works but that's probably using HTML5 for the mobile site. I did get a warning on some random site that I didn't have flash player 7 installed, so I guess it doesn't work. But if I really need flash I can always switch to the Android browser.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:00 pm
by Doombrain
Only ask because i run my xoom on ICS but used an image from the US so thought it might be a local thing. I guess it'll be added when the beta ends.
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:12 pm
by U4EA
Chrome Beta doesn't support flash, it's one of the most common complaints in its review section on the Play Store. At this point I don't think they'll be adding flash support any time soon:
http://www.iontab.com/news/chrome-for-a ... -beta-soon
Re: Tapatalk
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:31 pm
by Doombrain
ah, handy. anyway the stock ICS browser seems quicker.