Page 1 of 1
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:31 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
LOL
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:33 am
by Ryoki
Hah

Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:52 am
by andyman
awesome

Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:59 pm
by seremtan
digital copies of physical property to be just as valuable as the original
lol no, it isn't even remotely about that. it's about your claimed property rights vis-a-vis disposing of your property (physical, digital, whatever) in whatever way you see fit, vs their claimed property rights expressed as trying to control the manner in which you do that
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:48 am
by Eraser
lol, saw that posted on slashdot and came here to post a link to it as well
It also reminds me of this:

Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:36 am
by Ryoki
I've always wondered why the Fahrenheit system of temperature is still in use, his scale makes absolutely no sense at all.
According to a letter Fahrenheit wrote to his friend Herman Boerhaave,[11] his scale was built on the work of Ole Rømer, whom he had met earlier. In Rømer's scale, brine freezes at zero, water freezes and melts at 7.5 degrees, body temperature is 22.5, and water boils at 60 degrees. Fahrenheit multiplied each value by four in order to eliminate fractions and increase the granularity of the scale. He then re-calibrated his scale using the melting point of ice and normal human body temperature (which were at 30 and 90 degrees); he adjusted the scale so that the melting point of ice would be 32 degrees and body temperature 96 degrees, so that 64 intervals would separate the two, allowing him to mark degree lines on his instruments by simply bisecting the interval six times (since 64 is 2 to the sixth power).
Really, what? That's just making numbers up so that they're psychologically pleasing to a mathematical mind, what an idiot.
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:06 am
by MKJ
i like the initial reasoning; multiply by four to remove fractions.
because as we know, temperture increases by full degrees exclusively.
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:33 am
by 4days
that's how maths was done in the olden/pre-industry days - i remember having imperial measurements and old british currency (when we had shillings, ha'pennies and guineas and a pound was worth 8.69 mackerel if the moon was in pisces or something) explained to me by a pensioner and it did make a sort of sense. things were far more about cash transactions and real world applications back then, so there were all sorts of rules that someone who might not even be able to count past their fingers/read could apply to determine the size/value of a thing.
the same pensioner told me about some guy (maybe called 'white'?) who came up with the idea of standardising sizes for things like threads and gears, something that must have held back the creation of machines for ages. there was some uproar at the time because he'd based them on fractions of an inch rather than the more accepted wisdom of the length of a child's finger or the width of a donkey's nipple.
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:58 am
by Eraser
4days wrote:the more accepted wisdom of the length of a child's finger or the width of a donkey's nipple.

Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:44 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:51 am
by Transient
Buy Ass Fudge and get Clubcard points!

Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:52 am
by Underpants?
Eraser wrote:lol, saw that posted on slashdot and came here to post a link to it as well
It also reminds me of this:

actually mister high and might year month day sorts better. Just sayin.
Re: Poor outdone RIAA gets a charity
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:54 am
by MKJ
Its how they do it japan. Makes sense for sorting, but not for practical relevance.