Page 1 of 1
Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:50 am
by MKJ
Google wants a slice of the Wikipedia-pie and decides to build it's own
http://knol.google.com/
seriously, do we need another wiki?
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:51 am
by +JuggerNaut+
some people around here need one to quote more "sources"
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:55 am
by bork[e]
MKJ wrote:we need another wiki?
if google can capitalize on the shortcomings of the original then yes
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:31 pm
by Underpants?
wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 4:00 pm
by andyman
i wonder how long it's going to be in beta mode, like google mail
and this is pointless...
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:07 pm
by Therac-25
it's search sucks like rain on a wedding day.
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:49 pm
by seremtan
Underpants? wrote:wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
i don't think wikipedia is really aimed at an academic audience [/understatementofthedecade]
it's for people who want a quick answer to one of those kinds of questions that come up randomly, like "what's the capital of suriname?" or "what's that condition called when you only have one testicle?"
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:54 pm
by Fender
^ lol
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:56 pm
by andyman
the only thing i like about wikipedia is that most of the pictures posted on the pages are a decently high resolution
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:14 am
by glossy
Underpants? wrote:wikipedia falls short often enough to be considered a weak if not unacceptable source in most of academia.
if the google implementation is based on the same principles, i don't really know how it's going to be any better.
They're trying to counter this through accountability. It's not an "encyclopedia that anyone can edit", it's an encyclopedia that only certain people who are experts in their field and have been verified as such can edit.
At the moment it's pretty loaded down with medical articles which I guess could have been expected due to its focus, but I don't think we'll be seeing any 2,000 word articles on Weezer's Pork and Beans single on it any time soon.
Re: Googlepedia..
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:12 pm
by Pext
wikipedia is also the best math resource on the web