Quake3World

http://www.gamespot.com/features/617183 ... lk=topslot

To me the 360 really seems to look better in almost everything.


But at the same time, I wouldn't pay a lot of attention to the details they point out in the middle of a game....shadows seem to look more realistic in the 360 games (like in virtual tennis.) And do the PS3 shots look sort of washed out in a lot of the games to anyone else?

more aliasing on the ps3 shots. better lighting and textures on the 360.

MLB2k7 looks hot. lol at virtrua tennis looking about the same as my DC version (which fkn rocked btw)

owned

I wonder what odium thinks.

Massive Quasars wrote:I wonder what odium thinks.

Odium wrote: Wahh Wahh I work at a videogame store so i am the authority on video games and all entitys of gaming rawr lawlz i r smarts

ps3's controller's are crazy light. that counts for something, right?

i donno. i have a PS3 here at work for HD demos. i quite like the look and feel of the PS3, and it's QUIET.
if some great games come out for it and HDDVD dies i'll be buying a PS3

Hey goth boy, I worked in a video game store quite a while ago. Keep up dear.

What this article shows for me is how fucking awesome Bethesda Softworks' TES engine is... They've got as much of a powerhouse there as Epic have with the unreal engine.

Foo wrote:What this article shows for me is how fucking awesome Bethesda Softworks' TES engine is... They've got as much of a powerhouse there as Epic have with the unreal engine.

that's what i didn't think.

Doombrain wrote:

Foo wrote:What this article shows for me is how fucking awesome Bethesda Softworks' TES engine is... They've got as much of a powerhouse there as Epic have with the unreal engine.

that's what i didn't think.

Seconded. (Is that a word lol)

While Oblivions engine is good, its not UE3. Remember UE3 isn't just "Gears", its a much more complex engine that can do so much more than Gears ever threw at it. Not even UT3 will use all the engines features.

rgoer wrote:as somebody who has worked with both pieces of hardware in a development environment, I have to say that the PS3 is a fucking dog... it is just weak as shit and that's a fact

with an identical scene (with identical assets) you have to bend over backwards and kiss your own asshole to get half the fillrate from the PS3 that you get on the 360

Anything from Sony is a fucking nightmare to develop for.

360 looks better.

o'dium wrote:

Doombrain wrote:

Foo wrote:What this article shows for me is how fucking awesome Bethesda Softworks' TES engine is... They've got as much of a powerhouse there as Epic have with the unreal engine.

that's what i didn't think.

Seconded. (Is that a word lol)

While Oblivions engine is good, its not UE3. Remember UE3 isn't just "Gears", its a much more complex engine that can do so much more than Gears ever threw at it. Not even UT3 will use all the engines features.

Who fucking cares what you can do? What's important is what you actually choose to do in the game, and even more importantly, how you do it.

Serious question, o'pium: Do you know how to write a game engine, e.g. what it consists of, what it does, how to make design decisions etc.?

Grudge wrote:

o'dium wrote:

Doombrain wrote: that's what i didn't think.

Seconded. (Is that a word lol)

While Oblivions engine is good, its not UE3. Remember UE3 isn't just "Gears", its a much more complex engine that can do so much more than Gears ever threw at it. Not even UT3 will use all the engines features.

Who fucking cares what you can do? What's important is what you actually choose to do in the game, and even more importantly, how you do it.

I believe the quote was "They've got as much of a powerhouse there as Epic have with the unreal engine.". That doesn't even touch on gameplay, sir.

So, does not answering my question mean 'no, I have no idea what this "game engine"-thingie does...'?

diego wrote:So, does not answering my question mean 'no, I have no idea what this "game engine"-thingie does...'?

What question? Maybe ask a question in the first place?

You dumb shit.

diego wrote:Serious question, o'pium: Do you know how to write a game engine, e.g. what it consists of, what it does, how to make design decisions etc.?

diego wrote:Serious question, o'pium: Do you know how to write a game engine, e.g. what it consists of, what it does, how to make design decisions etc.?

lol

GONNAFISTYA wrote:You dumb shit.

diego wrote:Serious question, o'pium: Do you know how to write a game engine, e.g. what it consists of, what it does, how to make design decisions etc.?

flames in the void please, you fat cunt.

riddla wrote:double standard++

not getting it++++

Grudge wrote:

o'dium wrote:

Doombrain wrote: that's what i didn't think.

Seconded. (Is that a word lol)

While Oblivions engine is good, its not UE3. Remember UE3 isn't just "Gears", its a much more complex engine that can do so much more than Gears ever threw at it. Not even UT3 will use all the engines features.

Who fucking cares what you can do? What's important is what you actually choose to do in the game, and even more importantly, how you do it.

I wasn't talking about gameplay, I was talking about utilizing the technology and adding production value. A game can look great technically, but still have shitty production value (for example Ureal 2 and UT 2004)