new tsunami to hit Asia?
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:20 pm
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:21 pm
just heard about this now, wouldnt the tsunami already of been seen if there was one though ?
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:22 pm
nah, takes couple of hours
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:23 pm
tell him to hurry up im bored 
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:23 pm
4 hours ago.....lord are they in for a suprise!!!!
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:24 pm
whats with the chav in yer sig? 
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:25 pm
because theyre the ones who purchase 'wanker lights'
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:27 pm
i hate chavs, the trend flew over to here, fuckin minor noobs
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:31 pm
to many sigs in this thread.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:34 pm
loldmmh wrote:i hate chavs, the trend flew over to here, fuckin minor noobs
the ones i dont get on with are the < 15 yr olds who hang round in groups of 10 infront of mcdonalds tryna scab some spare change so they can buy his 13yr olds girlfriends baby a dummy
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:38 pm
asked this in another thread but didnt get an answer i dont think but what exactly is a chav?
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:41 pm
Chupacabra wrote:asked this in another thread but didnt get an answer i dont think but what exactly is a chav?
This is a chav.
See http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=chav&r=f
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:43 pm
Firefox + Adblocker = No ghey sigsshaft wrote:to many sigs in this thread.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:47 pm
"Authorities can assume the danger has passed if no tsunami waves are observed in the region near the epicenter within three hours of the earthquake," it added.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:48 pm
my sig owns u noobs
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:48 pm
Amen. Sig free here as well.Giraffe }{unter wrote:Firefox + Adblocker = No ghey sigsshaft wrote:to many sigs in this thread.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:50 pm
damn that shit :icon33:SplishSplash wrote:"Authorities can assume the danger has passed if no tsunami waves are observed in the region near the epicenter within three hours of the earthquake," it added.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:51 pm
i cant even read itdmmh wrote:my sig owns u noobs
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:52 pm
i still don't understand the point of sigs...
oh, but on topic... nice to see that the super expensive pacific warning system that the US and Japan setup actually works.
the only reason that the other tsunami was so bad was because it originated in the indian ocean, where there is no warning system.
oh, but on topic... nice to see that the super expensive pacific warning system that the US and Japan setup actually works.
the only reason that the other tsunami was so bad was because it originated in the indian ocean, where there is no warning system.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:55 pm
This new quake happened about 100 miles from the last one.Dr_Watson wrote:i still don't understand the point of sigs...
oh, but on topic... nice to see that the super expensive pacific warning system that the US and Japan setup actually works.
the only reason that the other tsunami was so bad was because it originated in the indian ocean, where there is no warning system.
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:56 pm
on the same vault to be precise. watsowned
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:58 pm
fault to be precise. cinemasiowned.dmmh wrote:on the same vault to be precise. watsowned
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:05 pm
lol
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:09 pm
Chavs are Burberry Boys? :lol:
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 8:29 pm
"Small" tsunami detected:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/0 ... index.html