Quake3World

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:01 pm**

remember when they were good?

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... =2879&p=10

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:02 pm**

should the US bomb amd?

unless ur a mornan... http://www.prisonplanet.com/assfuck/geo ... ml?fag=392

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:26 pm**

As far as I’m concerned, AMD is all that’s wrong with the world.

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:29 pm**

i nererd had one

intel good

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:49 pm**

:ghw45rt6y:

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:54 pm**

fushia?

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:06 pm**

So memory latency is actually higher with the new chipset? Why would they let it out the door that way?

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:42 pm**

house of cards?

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:20 pm**

well they had a good run competing with the mighty intel giving more bang for the buck but now it appears its over

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:50 pm**

Intel as a monopoly isn't a good thing for consumers. Same thing with nVidia.

As long as these companies are equally competitive, they will continue to drive prices down and increase performance.

So I hope AMD/ATI can pull through with something equally competitive.

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:07 pm**

indeed

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:11 pm**

I'm still running an AMD T-Bird 1Ghz... I need to upgrade. Surprisingly, though, my system still runs faster in some areas than a lot of my buddies who have upteen million mhz of power. That's probably because I know how to optimize my machine and turn off all the bullshit that windows deems necessary.

EDIT: spleeling.

Posted: **Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:04 pm**

I agree with obsidian, but I am somewhat happy to see Intel be so good at gaming. I'm sure it will be a pendulum that will swing in AMDs favor eventually.

Quake3World

amd...

amd...