Page 1 of 1
terrible
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:55 am
by Massive Quasars
Re: terrible
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:55 am
by Who
Massive Quasars wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4338245.stm
unlucky
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 1:55 am
by Massive Quasars
quick response
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:04 am
by feedback
what a tr
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:05 am
by phantasmagoria
oh, ffs
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:07 am
by lars63
That's suckie!!!
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:07 am
by Scourge
Well that sux.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:21 am
by tnf
Well, we do need a lot of cash in that nation building fund. Some things are going to have to go.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:43 am
by megami
From slashdot:
By my calculations at $166 million a day to be in Iraq, the US government could save the Voyager's first year's $4.5 million by leaving Iraq 39 minutes early.
39 minutes to save 28 years of effort.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:56 am
by Canidae
Paul Allen could save these missions with his lunch money.
They would also compliment his other spaceship.
He could start a collection of spaceships by supporting them and in return they can let him put his name on them like his telescope array.
Too bad Gates is such a house nerd with no ambitions like him.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:16 am
by Massive Quasars
tnf wrote:Well, we do need a lot of cash in that nation building fund. Some things are going to have to go.
-$4.2m a year
-Voy. 1 and 2 are 14 billion and 11 billion km from Earth
-launched in 1977
-another
15 years of life left in them
My point is that we won't be getting probes that deep into space for a while to come, why throw away such a resource particularly when it costs so little (comparatively) to run. Yes their technology is long obselete, but it's all we've got out there. It's the farthest we've sent man-made technology as of yet.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:30 am
by tnf
Massive Quasars wrote:tnf wrote:Well, we do need a lot of cash in that nation building fund. Some things are going to have to go.
-$4.2m a year
-Voy. 1 and 2 are 14 billion and 11 billion km from Earth
-launched in 1977
-another
15 years of life left in them
My point is that we won't be getting probes that deep into space for a while to come, why throw away such a resource particularly when it costs so little (comparatively) to run. Yes their technology is long obselete, but it's all we've got out there. It's the farthest we've sent man-made technology as of yet.
I agree with you completely. I was being sarcastic...
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 5:45 am
by Transient
megami wrote:From slashdot:
By my calculations at $166 million a day to be in Iraq, the US government could save the Voyager's first year's $4.5 million by leaving Iraq 39 minutes early.
39 minutes to save 28 years of effort.
:lol:
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 6:46 am
by Canis
Right when they turn it off a space alien ship will zoom by it's main camera.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:48 am
by saturn
Canis wrote:Right when they turn it off a space alien ship will zoom by it's main camera.
"Bring me to your lea...*SHUTS OFF*..."
I can't believe how they can shut off one of their most succesful spacecrafts in history. I've grown up with the beautiful images from Voyager. :icon33:
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:06 am
by mjrpes
megami wrote:From slashdot:
By my calculations at $166 million a day to be in Iraq, the US government could save the Voyager's first year's $4.5 million by leaving Iraq 39 minutes early.
39 minutes to save 28 years of effort.
Yes, but the cumulative savings is $4.2 million/year * 15 years = $63 million. that's just over a third of a day in Iraq. The US would have to leave Iraq
before suppertime.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 10:41 am
by Grudge
Fucking Bush.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:02 am
by dmmh
its all about priorities.
Naturally, inflicting war throughout this world far outweighs the value of scienctific data which could give us more insight into the evolution of the universe
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:15 am
by Survivor