Page 1 of 5

Remember the Popular Mechanics article on 9/11?

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:25 pm
by R00k
Apparently it was written by Michael Chertoff's cousin. He's the new Director of Homeland Security, coincidentally -- the massive government bureaucracy that was created thanks to the official 9/11 report.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ma ... cousin.htm

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:31 pm
by bitWISE
Nepotism has such a cool ring to it but has such a shitty definition...

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:32 pm
by R00k
lol, I've thought the exact same thing before myself.

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:35 pm
by bitWISE
That is a pretty incredible find. Its so damn creepy how all this stuff keeps falling into place.

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:38 pm
by R00k
Remember, if the 9/11 Commission's official report is found not to be credible, then there is practically no reason for the Dept. of Homeland Security to exist. :smirk:

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:45 pm
by Dr_Watson
its kinda like a "sneaky coup"

Not

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:16 am
by Fender
R00k wrote:Remember, if the 9/11 Commission's official report is found not to be credible, then there is practically no reason for the Dept. of Homeland Security to exist. :smirk:
Not too hard to argue that it shouldn't exist regardless.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:14 am
by R00k
true.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:48 am
by Pext
stop your subversive thoughts plz.

Re: Remember the Popular Mechanics article on 9/11?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:07 am
by Ryoki
R00k wrote:Apparently it was written by Michael Chertoff's cousin. He's the new Director of Homeland Security, coincidentally -- the massive government bureaucracy that was created thanks to the official 9/11 report.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ma ... cousin.htm
Lol, goddamn the lies never stop. Good find.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:18 pm
by Nightshade
That entire Alex Jones column is one massive assumption.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:47 pm
by R00k
Which Alex Jones column are you talking about?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:54 pm
by Freakaloin
check this out..this gas station had a perfect view of the pentagon and security cameras caught the crash...but the fbi came and took the tapes...hmmmmmm

http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm
Image

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:12 pm
by R00k
You don't know that the cameras were even looking in the direction of the Pentagon.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:15 pm
by Freakaloin
yeah but the fbi took just incase...

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:16 pm
by Freakaloin
and from those pics it looks like a camera would have been trained on those pumps...and the station is behind so it probably did get it...

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:22 pm
by Freakaloin
remeber nitwits...there are thousands of cameras at the pentagon...yet they only released 1 and it doesn't show shit...and they wouldn't even release the film...just a few screen shots of it...and only after a big uproar that there was a cover up...hmmmm

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:52 pm
by Nightshade
R00k wrote:Which Alex Jones column are you talking about?
The one about Chertoff's cousin.

Oh, and Geoof is an idiot.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:13 pm
by Freakaloin
nightshade...why do u believe the official story?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:19 pm
by Nightshade
Which official story, and who said I did?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:20 pm
by Freakaloin
for instance...instead of a movie, the pentagon release these...
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

notice the date and time are wrong...the plane is not really visible in the first pic and is supposedly hidden behind that booth thingie...

only a moron would believe this shit...nightshade?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:20 pm
by Freakaloin
Nightshade wrote:Which official story, and who said I did?
fuck u moron...

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:25 pm
by Pext
lol... the date has been copied in from the windows editor

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:27 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
I'd like to point out that just because this guy is Chetoff's cousin, it doesn't make the report invalid.

Did popular mechanics get a slew of letters from engineers saying the article was bullshit? Are architects organizing to speak with a unified voice to say that planes ramming into the wtc didn't make it fall?

Where are the professionals who claim the buildings couldn't have fallen due to the planes impacting them?

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:33 pm
by Freakaloin
engineers all over the world call bullshit on the official story...