Quake3World

looks like the GOP might be okay this November...


check out this summary

http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflas ... fraud.html

hop down off that cross, use the wood to build a bridge and get over it.

booker wrote:hop down off that cross, use the wood to build a bridge and get over it.

Oh shit, someone's questioning authority. Get the cross.

booker wrote:hop down off that cross, use the wood to build a bridge and get over it.

Take that head, stick it right back in the sand.

booker wrote:hop down off that cross, use the wood to build a bridge and get over it.

it's only human nature to keep taking and taking. that's why we have checks and balances to stop us from fucking each other up the ass.

well that's why we HAD checks and balances...

\o/ for canadians

JulesWinnfield wrote:\o/ for canadians

you realise now how wrong you were and are usually right?

Sometimes you like to argue simply for the sake of making the dooey green face smile at you.

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:looks like the GOP might be okay this November...


check out this summary

http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflas ... fraud.html

ffs....

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote: http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflas ... fraud.html

That's the most comprehensive article about the noise around the 2004 elections i've seen so far. Good find :icon14:

The depth of idiocy of some of my coworkers is astonishing. I sent out the link to a few folks:

For any of you still laboring under the delusion that the 2004 elections were legitimate (not that Kerry would have been much better than monkeyboy), read this rather well researched and documented article:

http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflas ... fraud.html

Wake up.

This is what I got from one of the Bushies.

My dear learned friend,
Regardless the number of times one measures his peter, it will not grow larger. The outcome will remain the same on all subsequent checks.
Most are able to come to gripes with this fact of life and accept it as it, however unpleasant or frustrating for them.
For one to become fixated on such measurement, or to obsessively re-examine it continually hoping or expecting a different outcome implies madness.

ie. - He lost. Stop being mad about it.

Respectfully, and fully awake,
Your friend

It's amazing. He actually thinks that this is just a case of sour grapes.

Perhaps the writer of that has come to terms with his impotency.

Or he didn't read it and dismissed it out of hand as leftist propaganda.

That's the problem with a couple of the Bushie bozos I work with. They just want to label everyone that isn't a right-wing fundamentalist christian Bushbot as a liberal, god-and-America hating fag0t that gives blowjobs to terrorists when not raping nuns or kicking preschoolers in the face. It allows them to dismiss any opposing viewpoints without making any substantive argument.

Yeah, polarising issues in politics is a surefire way of ending any sort of debate. Usually when people do it in a discussion i tend to stop trying to get my point across.

Which is also bad of course :\

booker wrote:get over it.

wait, so you're saying that since something's in the past we should just forget about it and move on because it doesn't matter anymore? like if someone stole your car you'd just "get over it" because it's already stolen and you can't do anything about it? since you're feeling so forgiving, i'll be right over to fuck your mother in the ass.

maybe that should just be bush's new motto: too late, get over it. iraq's a debacle? too late! failure to take action on katrina warnings? too late! outed a cia agent to the press for political reasons? too late! payed US journalists to engage in domestic propaganda? too late! ballooning national debt? too late! flagrantly destructive environmental policy? too late! iranian nukes? too late!

Actually, that does seem to be the republitard modus operandi pretty much everywhere I look.

Yea, don't you guys remember, we gave him a MANDATE, which means we fully approve of everything he has done, and we can no longer criticize any of his actions.

Oh wait, that goes back to assuming he was legitimately elected, doesn't it?