Page 1 of 1

Smoking ban in UK pubs...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:28 am
by Ezekiel
There was never any real doubt about the outcome of the governments campaign for smoke free public places in England, but it would be fair to say that the announcements today did surprise a few people. The term ’total ban’ is one that has been at the centre of many a debate in pubs country wide, and the customers at work were in full-on whinge mode this evening.

”Its discrimination!”
“You’ll lose your job you know – there will be nobody to serve!”
“The government won’t be happy until we are all eating carrot sticks at home!”
“You can kiss goodbye to the pub trade, we’ll all drink at home!”


As the bartender I should be bricking myself. According to the customers I’ll have no job and my personal licence certificate will be worthless. It is a shame that they all have such one-track minds. I’m a non-smoker, and although I can see the reasoning behind both sides of the argument I still couldn’t care less. If you want a good drink you’ll end up in a bar at some point whether you smoke or not!

If I want to socialise with my mates I’ll go to the pub to do it. I’ve always got a few cans and bottles in the fridge in case people end up back at my house or there is a something worth watching on the telly, but if I wanted to meet up with people I wouldn’t do it sat in my living room. If a group of you are going to watch a football match then you tend to watch it in a pub even if you do have Sky at home. If you are going to have more than a few cans where do you go? The pub. If you are meeting everybody before a night out where do you all decide to go? The pub.

Trade has picked up again after an initial dip in Ireland following the ban, and there are bars in the city centre that are pretty much non-smoking already that are still packed on a weekend.

If people want to go out then they will – if the inability to smoke inside a bar is really that much of a deterrent you’ve got problems. If you’d rather sit at home cradling a can of Carling or a bottle of Corona just so you can smoke I’d be rather worried. The drink may be the same but the atmosphere certainly isn’t.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:39 am
by Duhard
1v1????

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:43 am
by Foo
Exactly right.

I think the main issue with smoking is that it has an effect on those around you so regardless of your freedom to do whatever the fuck you want to yourself, there's no right to damage the health of others. That includes those who are employed at places like this too, as they get hit the hardest having to stand there night on night.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:51 am
by Clauz
As a cigar smoker I'm always amused by laws like these because they get all the cigarette smokers up in arms.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:02 am
by losCHUNK
im just gunna stick to locals which allow smoking from now on

i enjoy smoking, why break a habit of a lifetime

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:43 am
by YourGrandpa
Welcome to the good ol' USA.

Get in line and march in lock-step.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:59 am
by Dukester
the vices go together

the owners of the bar should be the ones making the decision for the bar they own.

if you don't wanna drink by a smoker then don't go into that bar.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:19 am
by seremtan
i gave up for good nearly a year ago so frankly i don't give a shit any more. it'll be nice to come back from nights out not stinking of other people's stale smoke however

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:28 am
by Scourge
I quit smoking and going to bars. I'm good to go.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:27 am
by seremtan
you can do good business in bars, allegedly

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:01 am
by S@M
this is a good thing for everyone, even smokers.

zeke are you getting ur old avitar back?

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:04 am
by Grudge
The banned all smoking in bars and restaurants here last summer. It's been great. Everyone was complaining before the ban, but it's turned out to be a great success.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:28 am
by 4days
ireland seemed to cope with it well enough. if it encourages a lot of people to quit then it can't be a bad thing.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:34 am
by Doombrain
seremtan wrote:i gave up for good nearly a year ago so frankly i don't give a shit any more. it'll be nice to come back from nights out not stinking of other people's stale smoke however
Yep. Look at the paddy's. Their pubs are still packed out and most of the smokers would rather have it smoke free in the pubs.
LOL I SAY

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:38 am
by Mr.Magnetichead
Foo wrote:Exactly right.

I think the main issue with smoking is that it has an effect on those around you so regardless of your freedom to do whatever the fuck you want to yourself, there's no right to damage the health of others. That includes those who are employed at places like this too, as they get hit the hardest having to stand there night on night.
But what degree do you then take that to? Do stop people being able to drink to protect the health of those people who are injured by either drunk drivers or drunken yobs?

Do you stop anyone driving a car or vehicle that produces waste fumes? Do you shut down big industry? Do you close the army?

Where do you draw the line?

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:01 am
by reefsurfer
Grudge wrote:The banned all smoking in bars and restaurants here last summer. It's been great. Everyone was complaining before the ban, but it's turned out to be a great success.
yup.
and now your clothes dont smell like a fucking bonfire when ya get home from the pub.

Do what us swedes do: http://www.snusworldwide.com/us/


Image

mmmmm..yummy.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:16 am
by 4days
wow, that looks fucking disgusting.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:30 am
by MKJ
swedes rape goteborgs? thats sick

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:30 pm
by Foo
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:Where do you draw the line?
Good question.

The distinction I personally draw is that the other items you listed:
A: Have a beneficial function to society (the drink one is a bit controversial I guess).
B: Do not impinge directly on others (1 person drinking will not automatically go drink driving, for example).

Note smoking isn't being banned, it's still legal. What's being made illegal is doing it in public where it has an effect on others.

Also: Democracy - If more people want it than dont want it, it happens. That's how it's supposed to work.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:26 pm
by Mr.Magnetichead
This wasn't a democratic decision though. The public had no input and the ban does not effect people in the houses of parliment. They're still allowed to smoke in there.

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:28 pm
by Grudge
Democracy != representative parlamentarism

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:03 pm
by Ezekiel
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:This wasn't a democratic decision though. The public had no input and the ban does not effect people in the houses of parliment. They're still allowed to smoke in there.
It has no effect on the bars in the houses of parliment either...
S@M wrote:zeke are you getting ur old avitar back?
Not sure if it exists anymore to be quite honest with you. :paranoid: