Page 1 of 1

Who watched 24 tonight?

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:31 am
by tnf
What happened? I need a quick synopsis.

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:45 am
by andyman
Jack and Audrey are started to get real close again, which can only mean one thing: Audrey will die (prediction)

Jack's plan to stop walt or whatever his name is went through, but it took longer and had more turns than expected. Jack tortured the guy as well... fucking awesome

and the nerve gas wasn't inside the cargo box like it was supposed to be, because the terrorists found out about a secondary detonator.

This episode was really fuckin good if you ask me... it showed what everyone is made of for the most part (as if we didnt know jack already, we go deeper into his character still)

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:45 am
by andyman
oh and the synopsis on the website should be up tomrorow

http://www.fox.com/24/

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:51 am
by mrd
I saw a glimpse of it... just saw two dudes talking on the phone. One looked like he was in jail. :paranoid:

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:59 am
by andyman
They didn'y show Curtis in this episode at all... or Tony... what gives?

and there was no jail either...

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 6:01 am
by Maiden
pffft. skating with celebrities is where its at

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:02 am
by mjrpes
I don't watch 24 but I do have a nagging question: does Jack stay awake for the full 24 hours? Or is there an occasional episode where he is 'napping'?

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:05 am
by andyman
he's awake... dude he's hardcore. he can stay awake without thinking about it.

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:07 am
by mjrpes
So, these consecutive seasons of the show... are they back to back days?

Because he's really hardcore if this is season four and he's still awake after 72 hours. Does the man ever show fatigue or start to hallucinate?

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:53 am
by Transient
The second season took place a year later, the 3rd took place about 6 months later, etc.

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 11:13 am
by andyman
Transient wrote:The second season took place a year later, the 3rd took place about 6 months later, etc.
i thought the third was about 1.5 years later..

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 5:33 pm
by DooMer
I hope that audrey cunt dies. Just looking at her fucked up, mangled face pisses me off.

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:43 pm
by Transient
andyman wrote:
Transient wrote:The second season took place a year later, the 3rd took place about 6 months later, etc.
i thought the third was about 1.5 years later..
Probably. :paranoid:

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:43 am
by sliver
There is something that doesn't make any sense to me. Say you are Cummings, and you are letting a bunch of terrorists steal nerve gas out of the country so that you can remotely detonate it and kill them all once it's in their camp. Why in the FUCK would you send a guy carrying your remote detonator to close the deal? The terrorists aren't even supposed to know your detonator exists, so why would you stupidly give it to a guy they are likely to kill?

It just seems to me that any intelligent person would keep the remote detonator far away from the terrorists or anyone they knew about, in which case they could have tortured that guy and he wouldn't have known anything, and the scum would be happily on their way to get remotely blown up. But instead the deal-closer was carrying the detonator, and the terrorists killed him and took it, and now there's no stopping htem [aside from Bauer].

So am I missing something or were Cummings' actions completely illogical [beyond the whole "half-cooperate with terrorists in order to kill them" scheme]

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:49 am
by andyman
sliver wrote:There is something that doesn't make any sense to me. Say you are Cummings, and you are letting a bunch of terrorists steal nerve gas out of the country so that you can remotely detonate it and kill them all once it's in their camp. Why in the FUCK would you send a guy carrying your remote detonator to close the deal? The terrorists aren't even supposed to know your detonator exists, so why would you stupidly give it to a guy they are likely to kill?

It just seems to me that any intelligent person would keep the remote detonator far away from the terrorists or anyone they knew about, in which case they could have tortured that guy and he wouldn't have known anything, and the scum would be happily on their way to get remotely blown up. But instead the deal-closer was carrying the detonator, and the terrorists killed him and took it, and now there's no stopping htem [aside from Bauer].

So am I missing something or were Cummings' actions completely illogical [beyond the whole "half-cooperate with terrorists in order to kill them" scheme]


from what i can tell, the guy had to hold it to the canisters to extract the det code (or something.. i dont know much about remote detonators) so he had to have it on him to do this.