BMW Sauber F1.06 Launch
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:16 pm
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 1:44 pm
splendid
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:38 pm
do they have tits?
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 2:51 pm
Delectable
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 3:04 pm
Fucking grim crop of mingers, except for the one in the last pic. 
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:49 pm
how stupid
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 4:52 pm
i was waiting for the first homosexual to say the hot chicks r ugly...congrats nightshade...ur a homo...
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 5:57 pm
Tight clothes :icon26:booker wrote:do they have tits?
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:17 pm
3rd, 5th, 6th, and the last 3 are the same chick: Alessandra AmbrosioNightshade wrote:Fucking grim crop of mingers, except for the one in the last pic.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:20 pm
Awright, fuck the babes, let's get to the hardware shall we :icon26:Grudge wrote:how stupid
Check out the new BMW P86 F1 engine (2006-spec 2.4 liter V8) on the dyno :icon20:
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:45 pm
Holy fuck those headers run hot!
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:54 pm
Red hot headers are not that impressive anymore, i see them all the time on Sr setup 240's... the allmost liquid exaust Gass's that are firing out of them and being sucked in.. NOW that is impressive!
btw, what is the output this year?
btw, what is the output this year?
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:55 pm
most of the top set of pics are total crap. btw, i'm hoping Villanueve gets back in form this year. time is running out for him.
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:57 pm
no. impressive are performance figures for F1 engines. lol 240's.AmIdYfReAk wrote:Red hot headers are not that impressive anymore, i see them all the time on Sr setup 240's... the allmost liquid exaust Gass's that are firing out of them and being sucked in.. NOW that is impressive!
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:02 pm
I mean Glowing headers,
and when you run a SR setup, they run quite hot, and usually the Manafold, Turbo Trim housing, and the Down tube are glowing red after a little beating aroudn the track..
the engine its self is impressive.
And who's got the #'s for what this engine does?
and when you run a SR setup, they run quite hot, and usually the Manafold, Turbo Trim housing, and the Down tube are glowing red after a little beating aroudn the track..
the engine its self is impressive.
And who's got the #'s for what this engine does?
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:45 pm
no one has released figures for the V8's yet.AmIdYfReAk wrote: And who's got the #'s for what this engine does?
but in general, they're expecting around 700-800 bhp @ ~16K RPM.
from a 2.4L
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:54 am
Don't get your hopes too high about Villeneuve+JuggerNaut+ wrote:most of the top set of pics are total crap. btw, i'm hoping Villanueve gets back in form this year. time is running out for him.
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:15 am
Does this set suit your and Nightshade's tastes better?+JuggerNaut+ wrote:most of the top set of pics are total crap. btw, i'm hoping Villanueve gets back in form this year. time is running out for him.
Oh, I'm afraid time has already run out for JV :icon26:
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:17 am
I think 16K RPM is the general rev limit that will be imposed on the V10's this year. Most of the new V8's should run close to 20K RPM.Dr_Watson wrote:no one has released figures for the V8's yet.AmIdYfReAk wrote: And who's got the #'s for what this engine does?
but in general, they're expecting around 700-800 bhp @ ~16K RPM.
from a 2.4L
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:50 am
jesus... 20K redline? that is a LONG first gear! 
i was amazed when i seen the high rev build up's for the Honda B16's and the Mazda 1.8L V6's to get them past the 10'000RPM mark... But 20'000!?!
wow.. just wow.
i am going to see if i can find the gear ratios and etc for the cart's, i have a feeling that first is incredably short.
i was amazed when i seen the high rev build up's for the Honda B16's and the Mazda 1.8L V6's to get them past the 10'000RPM mark... But 20'000!?!
wow.. just wow.
i am going to see if i can find the gear ratios and etc for the cart's, i have a feeling that first is incredably short.
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:31 am
Well, with a 7-speed gearbox, it's probably not that bad :icon32:
Here's a clip of the Cosworth F1 V8 hitting 20K RPM: http://www.cosworth.com/downloads/coswo ... 2fa7d7bc92
And remember this is all normally aspirated stuff, since forced induction isn't allowed in F1
Here's a clip of the Cosworth F1 V8 hitting 20K RPM: http://www.cosworth.com/downloads/coswo ... 2fa7d7bc92
And remember this is all normally aspirated stuff, since forced induction isn't allowed in F1
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:21 pm
speaking of high-revving insane hp:ltr engines... is the Suzuki Hayabusa engines the most efficient ever mass produced?
i was reading an article about the radical sr3 which uses an N/A 275hp 1.5L 4cyl Hayabusa motor. 183hp:ltr ... thats madness.
i was reading an article about the radical sr3 which uses an N/A 275hp 1.5L 4cyl Hayabusa motor. 183hp:ltr ... thats madness.
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2006 7:49 pm
that's nothing. gp bikes get 250-300hp out of a 990cc NA i4/v5.Dr_Watson wrote:speaking of high-revving insane hp:ltr engines... is the Suzuki Hayabusa engines the most efficient ever mass produced?
i was reading an article about the radical sr3 which uses an N/A 275hp 1.5L 4cyl Hayabusa motor. 183hp:ltr ... thats madness.
turbo'd busas get anywherer from 400-700hp depending oh how much boost you run, but it's not really practical for anything except straight lines.
edit: and the F1 engines put out more than 183hp/liter anyway. if you take the bottom range of 700hp/2.4l that's 291hp/l. in reality those engines drop more than 700hp, probably closer to 800hp.
edit2: nm you said mass produced. but to be fair a 1.5l busa engine is not really mass produced since it's bored out from it's normal 1.3l. in any case i think the zx10r or gsxr1k engine have the highest hp/l of any mass produced engines in stock form.