Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:37 am
I first read about the hyperdrive through the scotsman article. Otherwise I'm not at all familiar with it.
Funny thing, wonder why it took so long to decide to move the grids farther away from each other. I thought about that as I was reading about the particles hitting the second grid and deteriorating it.riddla wrote:On a semi-related note, Euros just tested an improved ion drive:
http://www.physorg.com/news9786.html
Ah well, I knew it was something with the lens. Btw, I remember watching one of the moon landings when I was a wee child.riddla wrote:well, speaking of lensesscourge34 wrote:Yup, was a while back.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Spa ... wed_mirror
interesting stuff indeed. they didn't say where the energy to make this happen is supposed to come from, but i guess by the time anything actually gets built we'll have fusion reactors that run off our own faecesriddla wrote:Anyone else here subscribe to the print magazine?
The article this week on Hyperdrive for space travel is quite excellent.
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fun ... 1.200.html
Article is from this issue.