Page 1 of 2
madrid building...lol@ppl who think wtc destroyed by fire...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:26 pm
by Freakaloin
before...
after...
any questions?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:33 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
i dont see a plane, or aeroplane fuel being burned..
i mean asbestos burns pritty hot... but.. i think any form of gass will carry more heat.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:36 pm
by Freakaloin
hey moron...the fires at the wtc were relativly small compared to this fired...the planes didn't damage the core enuff for the building to collapse...even the skeleton of the building alone could have held it up...but lets forget about the towers and focus on wtc7 which had smal fires on 2 floors...was built much sturdier then madrids building with much stronger codes...why did it fall again?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:42 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
what? do you think that the plane just found its way into the buildings without giving a huge amound of force to penetrate the building as well as its large amount of weight to top it all off?
buildings are designed to take a certan amound of weight and etc, adding a a plane that weights a few tons + Burning fuel is something to consider.
so if trying to calculate that is hurting your brain, continue thinking that it was weightless and etc. you dumb prick.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:42 pm
by Freakaloin
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:43 pm
by Freakaloin
he said fully loaded 707 mulitiple 707's...they are almost the same size as 757's dillweed...any questions?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:45 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
yea, weight class 4 vs 5.. also, ya know.. the hight of the building dosent account for anything.. btw.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:49 pm
by Freakaloin
ur just showing ur ignorance about the design of the building...
707 is less then 5% smaller...mulitple 707's is more then 1 757...and they took height into account before cumming up with those estimates...uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh tarded?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:53 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
and what? you are an expert? buddy.. deflate the hot air in your head and come back down and re-join the world.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:56 pm
by Freakaloin
k man..u believe what ur govt and media tell u...be a good little follower...don't pay attention to the thousands of experts and laws of physics and engineering who say something is fishy...conform...watch football...and don't think about whats important...go shop...buy bye...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:58 pm
by andyman
Freakaloin wrote:k man..u believe what ur govt and media tell u...be a good little follower...don't pay attention to the thousands of experts and laws of physics and engineering who say something is fishy...conform...watch football...and don't think about whats important...go shop...buy bye...
post on a forum full of people who dont give a fuck to begin with.
way to fight the system
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:58 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
Ummm, i bearly payed attention to the Actuall attack of 911... and i dident hear one report reguarding the buildings, in fact i dont care about it to much at all.
the US is to fucked to even try to pay attention to, so you have some fun in your little country let by an idiot, filled full of idiots.
gg.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:03 pm
by prince1000
GEOFF - REDNECK TURNED DISSIDENT AND PASSIVE INTERNET POLITICAL ACTIVIST AFTER DALE EARNHARDT'S DEATH. COINCIDENCE?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:06 pm
by Freakaloin
AmIdYfReAk wrote:Ummm, i bearly payed attention to the Actuall attack of 911... and i dident hear one report reguarding the buildings, in fact i dont care about it to much at all.
the US is to fucked to even try to pay attention to, so you have some fun in your little country let by an idiot, filled full of idiots.
gg.
was that english?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:07 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
engrish actually... where the fuck have you been?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:12 pm
by Freakaloin
u do know morons that the building in madrid had almost the same exact design as wtc7...except it was built with shittier materials and weaker codes right? but it burned a 1000x worse and much hotter and didn't fall...so the towers and wtc7 are the only steel framed buildings in the history of the world to completely collapse by fire. its as if the forces of phsyics are different in nyc...weird...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:14 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
allmost... allmost... i love that.. just play it off man...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:15 pm
by Freakaloin
ur obviously a shill for the bush admin...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:17 pm
by R00k
prince1000 wrote:goof - REDNECK TURNED DISSIDENT AND PASSIVE INTERNET POLITICAL ACTIVIST AFTER DALE EARNHARDT'S DEATH. COINCIDENCE?
:icon19:
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 12:30 am
by 4g3nt_Smith
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 12:35 am
by Geebs
I'm starting an internet collection to get goof his own pair of sandwich boards and megaphone, then he can fuck off and bore people in the real world.
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 12:48 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
like thatb guy Christopher who used to post here when he wasn't out on the streets with his megaphone.
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:53 am
by [xeno]Julios
i'm sorry i'm confused by the post title - are you implying the madrid fire was caused by a plane? or that 9/11 wasn't caused by a plane?
can u clarify? your topic title makes no sense to me...
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:57 am
by prince1000
the beauty of g e o f f
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 7:04 am
by Freakaloin
wtc7...a building almost exactly like the madrid building (except more well built) collapsed after a 7 hour fire on a few floors. the building fell exactly like a demolition so-called implosion. no steel frame building have ever collapsed due to fire. etc etc the owner of the towers even admits on camera they demoed the building. it makes alot of sense...
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/wtc7.html