Page 1 of 1

My fellow Americans

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:20 pm
by Foo
Image

THAT'S RIGHT.

Any questions?

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:35 pm
by Freakaloin
he's like a 16 year old cheerleader...wait...

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:38 pm
by hate
can you blame him..

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:41 pm
by Foo
You're supposed to blame him. That's why they picked a bumpkin halfwit.

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 2:44 pm
by Freakaloin
the buck stops where?...

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:59 pm
by Grudge
so, you guys voted for him?

twice?

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 5:35 pm
by Underpants?
actually, no. a debatable half did, and with less than mediocre alternate candidates (nader, hahahaha)

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:38 pm
by losCHUNK
Grudge wrote:so, you guys voted for him?

twice?

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:39 pm
by tnf
yea, but really only once as he lost the first time.

although how he even had a chance the second time...christ.

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:45 pm
by losCHUNK
then do something about it

i mean if you completely believe that he is not the true president of america then why sit down and just moan about it ?

wars have been fought over less

edit: not a personal attack at yourself good sir, just an observation

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 6:53 pm
by RiffRaff
tnf wrote:yea, but really only once as he lost the first time.

although how he even had a chance the second time...christ.
I see information still gets distorted around here.

Whether you like him or not, to be factual, he was elected by receiving the number of electoral college votes needed to become president. The overall popular vote means nothing in a presidential election. He wasn't the first president to lose the popular vote and win the electoral college. If you want to change this, amend the constitution.

As a teacher, you should know this.

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:00 pm
by tnf
RiffRaff wrote:
tnf wrote:yea, but really only once as he lost the first time.

although how he even had a chance the second time...christ.
The overall popular vote means nothing in a presidential election.
There's the problem. And I know that others have lost the popular vote and won the electoral. I was referring to the popular vote...the will of the people, since I was commenting on the 'you guys voted him in twice.'

Anyhow, if there's anything good about all of this its that we've got a Republican controlled house, senate, and presidency. And we have all had the chance now to see how well that works.

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:17 pm
by GONNAFISTYA
tnf wrote:Anyhow, if there's anything good about all of this its that we've got a Republican controlled house, senate, and presidency. And we have all had the chance now to see how well that works.
Yep. :olo:

Image

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:44 pm
by Sanction
Image

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:24 pm
by seremtan
RiffRaff wrote:
tnf wrote:yea, but really only once as he lost the first time.

although how he even had a chance the second time...christ.
I see information still gets distorted around here.

Whether you like him or not, to be factual, he was elected by receiving the number of electoral college votes needed to become president. The overall popular vote means nothing in a presidential election. He wasn't the first president to lose the popular vote and win the electoral college. If you want to change this, amend the constitution.

As a teacher, you should know this.
i don't think this was what tnf was referring to. i suspect he meant the fact that enough democrat voters to give gore florida were fraudulently purged from the electoral register (several tens of thousands, and bush 'won' by 537), and that bush was simply appointed president by his dad's conservative friends in the supreme court

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:03 pm
by Duhard
cocaine is good...anybody who's against it has got to be a gigantic moron..

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:00 pm
by seremtan
the mind is the greatest weapon, phil :olo:

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:47 pm
by tnf
seremtan wrote:
RiffRaff wrote:
tnf wrote:yea, but really only once as he lost the first time.

although how he even had a chance the second time...christ.
I see information still gets distorted around here.

Whether you like him or not, to be factual, he was elected by receiving the number of electoral college votes needed to become president. The overall popular vote means nothing in a presidential election. He wasn't the first president to lose the popular vote and win the electoral college. If you want to change this, amend the constitution.

As a teacher, you should know this.
i don't think this was what tnf was referring to. i suspect he meant the fact that enough democrat voters to give gore florida were fraudulently purged from the electoral register (several tens of thousands, and bush 'won' by 537), and that bush was simply appointed president by his dad's conservative friends in the supreme court
don't confuse the issue with these meaningless numbers. :p ;)

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:08 am
by seremtan
or meaningless principles, like democracy, legality etc.

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 1:26 am
by Scourge
seremtan wrote:the mind is the greatest weapon, phil :olo:
His just happens to be unloaded. :icon32:

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 3:44 am
by Foo
Decomissioned.