Page 1 of 1
Digital cameras
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:18 pm
by FragaGeddon
My brother's getting a digital camera from the wife for xmas.
What mega pixel do you recommend and what kind?
I was going to recommend at least a 5 megapixel with optical zoom, and probably by Cannon.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:23 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
from your wife?
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:32 pm
by FragaGeddon
No, I mean from his wife.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:33 pm
by FragaGeddon
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:from your wife?
My palm dosen't give out xmas presents.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:34 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
i think you'd get a more streamlined response by posting the $$ limit.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:41 pm
by FragaGeddon
Probbaly around $300ish Canadian.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:44 pm
by werldhed
It depends on how avid of a photographer he is. If it's just casual "trips to the in-laws" use, then he won't even need 5.0mpxl. 4.0 is probably fine.
If he wants enlargements, then go for 5.0 or higher.
Canon digicams are great, but check the red-eye quality. That's the only problem mine has. Typically, you don't even need to use a flash with digital cameras, so it's not such a big deal.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:47 pm
by FragaGeddon
Actually my Kodak 2 MP has redeye reduction.
I though all cameras now would have this feature.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 5:51 pm
by werldhed
Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:12 pm
by Guest
werldhed wrote:Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
To remove red eye you need either a secondary light source on the camera (usually a little lamp that lights up before u take the pic) or just get an external flash, so it will be a lot higher than the lens.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:42 am
by FragaGeddon
With mine, it flashes once, then on the second flash it takes a picture.
I think it just helps close the retina to reduce the red eye effect.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:03 am
by werldhed
FragaGeddon wrote:With mine, it flashes once, then on the second flash it takes a picture.
I think it just helps close the retina to reduce the red eye effect.
Yeah, that's what mine does. I think the time between the flashes is too short, so it doesn't have much of an effect.
Re: Digital cameras
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:09 am
by duffman91
FragaGeddon wrote:My brother's getting a digital camera from the wife for xmas.
What mega pixel do you recommend and what kind?
I was going to recommend at least a 5 megapixel with optical zoom, and probably by Cannon.
My personal opinion:
Stick with either Canon, nikon, or Olympus. 3 megapixels for the casual photographer, 4 megapixels for the enthusiast, and 5 megapixels for the avid enthusiast, 8+ megapixels for professionals.
http://dpreview.com/
^^^ great site to compare cameras.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:09 am
by FragaGeddon
My brother's looking for a small camera for his daughter that she can fit into her purse, any recommendations?
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:13 am
by duffman91
FragaGeddon wrote:My brother's looking for a small camera for his daughter that she can fit into her purse, any recommendations?
Canon powershot. 3/4/5 megapixels.
between $100 - $150 USD
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:18 am
by FragaGeddon
She has this camera:
So something smaller than that.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:21 am
by duffman91
FragaGeddon wrote:She has this camera:
So something smaller than that.
Kodak sucks.
Also, Canon Powershot
it doesn't get any smaller than that.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:36 am
by FragaGeddon
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:49 am
by FragaGeddon
I'm guessing if a camera dosen't have manual focus, than it dosen't have optical zoom.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:50 am
by FragaGeddon
I got the camera from work, so I got it at cost.
The Kodak one, that is.
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:00 am
by Doombrain
ToxicBug wrote:werldhed wrote:Oh, it has red-eye reduction. It just doesn't work well. I've used some other Canons that have the same problem. Like I said though, I don't typically use the flash, so it's not a big problem.
To remove red eye you need either a secondary light source on the camera (usually a little lamp that lights up before u take the pic) or just get an external flash, so it will be a lot higher than the lens.
lol
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 9:45 am
by phantasmagoria
red eye is caused by the camera catching a glimpse of inner demons that the naked eye normally cannot see.