Page 1 of 2

Declassified documents - US backed East Timor massacres

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:14 pm
by [xeno]Julios
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17 ... 98,00.html

yet only a handful of news sources reporting it:

http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=mo ... 9252&hl=en
THE US knew well in advance of and explicitly approved Indonesia's invasion of East Timor in 1975, newly declassified documents say.

Released this week by the independent Washington-based National Security Archive (NSA), the documents showed US officials were aware of the invasion plans nearly a year in advance.

They adopted a "policy of silence" and even sought to suppress news and discussions on East Timor, including credible reports of Indonesia's massacres of Timorese civilians, according to the documents.

East Timor is today an independent nation.

The people of East Timor voted in favour of breaking away from Indonesia in a UN-sponsored ballot in August 1999 before gaining full independence in May 2002 after more than two years of UN stewardship.

But the path to independence was bloody. Militia gangs reportedly directed by Indonesia's military went on a killing spree before and after the East Timorese referendum, killing about 1400 independence supporters.

Thirty years after the Indonesian invasion, the formerly secret US documents showed how multiple US administrations tried to conceal information on East Timor to avoid a controversy that would prompt a Congressional ban on weapons sales to Indonesia.

"I'm assuming you're really going to keep your mouth shut on the subject," then National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger told his staff in October 1975 in response to reports that Indonesia had begun its attack on East Timor.

The administration of President Gerald Ford knew that Indonesia had invaded East Timor using almost entirely US equipment, and that the use of that equipment for that purpose was illegal, the documents showed.

In 1977, officials of the administration of Ford's successor, Jimmy Carter, blocked declassification of an explosive cable transcribing President Ford and Secretary of State Kissinger's meeting with Indonesian President Suharto.

At the meeting in December 1975, they explicitly approved of the East Timor invasion, according to the documents.

Through the 1980s, US officials continued to receive -- and deny or dismiss -- credible reports of Indonesia's massacres of Timorese civilians.

The National Security Archive had provided more than 1000 formerly classified US documents to help an East Timorese commission of inquiry into human rights abuses that occurred between 1975 and 1999.

East Timor president Xanana Gusmao handed the commission's 2500-page report to the Timorese Parliament last Monday but wanted it withheld from the public, amid an outcry from opposition politicians and rights activists.

Brad Simpson, Director of the National Security Archive's Indonesia and East Timor documentation project, said he expected the commission's final report to show that Indonesia's invasion of East Timor and resulting crimes there "occurred in an international context in which the support of powerful nations, especially the US, was indispensable."

"These documents also point to the need for genuine international accountability for East Timor's suffering," he said.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:29 pm
by [xeno]Julios
more context here:

http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47254
Mr. Habib: I think what we are doing is like Jack -- keeping our mouth shut about the thing.

Kissinger: Is that conceivable?

Mr. Habib: We've been doing it, so I think it's quite conceivable.

Kissinger: No moral --

Mr. Habib: There's not that much interest. I think they'll probably be --

Kissinger: There are no moral lessons to be learned from this?

Mr. Habib: Yes. The moral lesson is that we have the guns to go in. (laughter.)
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB174/428.pdf

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:01 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Canada played a large role in facilitating the killing too. We are scummy.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:26 am
by Dave
that's all well and good, everyone knows the US has a lot of Vietnam War era skeletons in it's closet, but what's the whole historical context? Why did the US support Indonesia? What about the people of East Timor did the US fear? These things don't happen spontaneously. Sure we (and a lot of nations... the US isn't the only country possessing 'agency') turned a blind eye to some bad shit, but whining about a bunch dead people without visiting the whole story is misleading.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:02 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Dave wrote:that's all well and good, everyone knows the US has a lot of Vietnam War era skeletons in it's closet, but what's the whole historical context? Why did the US support Indonesia? What about the people of East Timor did the US fear? These things don't happen spontaneously. Sure we (and a lot of nations... the US isn't the only country possessing 'agency') turned a blind eye to some bad shit, but whining about a bunch dead people without visiting the whole story is misleading.
the whole story doesn't make it better dave.

here's a backgrounder which answers the questions you posed

http://www.etan.org/etanpdf/pdf3/CWHarticle.pdf

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:04 am
by Dave
thanks lover

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:05 am
by Dave
Oh, but I'll have to read it later.. I just finished reading the hardest fucking book I've ever had to read and now i have to write 12 - 15 pages :tear:

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:20 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
yuck

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:27 am
by Dave
It was a really good book though.... I highly recommend it if you're interested in the history behind the current Frano-Algerian struggle. It's timely given the recent riots in France. The author just likes to make me get out the dictionary, which teaches me new words, but also makes me reread sentences :D

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/025321 ... s&v=glance

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:44 am
by seremtan
Dave wrote:that's all well and good, everyone knows the US has a lot of Vietnam War era skeletons in it's closet, but what's the whole historical context? Why did the US support Indonesia? What about the people of East Timor did the US fear? These things don't happen spontaneously. Sure we (and a lot of nations... the US isn't the only country possessing 'agency') turned a blind eye to some bad shit, but whining about a bunch dead people without visiting the whole story is misleading.
US support for indonesia iirc was cold-war geopolitical in nature. US needed a strong US ally in SE Asia, which meant basically letting the indonesians do what they wanted (which means not lifting a finger in protest) and even helping them if necessary. oh, and the east timor massacres were 1975-1980 or thereabouts (*after* vietnam), about the same time as the khmer rouge were doing similar things - which were heavily reported upon while east timor was not

btw this isn't even a new story. kissinger and ford even had the indonesian generals delay the invasion a day until kissinger had left indonesia, for the sake of 'appearances'.

a number of countries' arms industries profited from the east timor massacres, notably the US but also the UK

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:58 am
by mjrpes
Write a review dave. The amazon page is kind of bare.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:00 am
by Dave
Yeah, maybe I'll post my 15 page paper :D

Man.. I'm procrastinating :(

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:18 am
by Canidae
THe US should have invaded and saved those Timorian! Must have been a Clark Kent moment, not a Superman one or perhaps the cape was in the cleaners...

WTF I'll bet representatives of the US and definitely the UK met Hitler before he invaded countries in Europe...does that make it their fault?

This topics smells...

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:29 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
uh they gave them all the weapons they used and turned a blind eye

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:40 am
by Canidae
My Indonesian friend doesn't think highly of the Timoresianinites.
He said they were ungrateful and and Indonesians were doing a them a favour.
I didn't bother arguing the point but I thought it was funny he has to grow a beard when he goes over (and on his drivers license) lest he gets killed going home without it. Crazy fucking part of the world.
But are you saying they gave them the weapons and then said "go kill them" or did they just sell weapons to them like lots of countries do and then when they heard about what the Indonesians wanted to do ,not asked for them back/ add a clause saying we reserve the right to recall the weapons at any time if we feel like it?
Because thats what I think your implying.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:44 am
by Foo
Ask for them back :olo:

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:52 am
by Canidae
My point exactly. It's hard to take back weapons from people.
Just ask the Russians with respect to all the bucks they made in Iraq. Or the French before they helped kill all those British sailors when they heard Argentina wanted to take back the Falklands... :)

Those Villains!!

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:56 am
by Foo
oic

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:29 am
by [xeno]Julios
Imagine someone supplied hitler with gas chambers, and encouraged him to go along with it, even when under international law the use of gas chambers to kill civilians is illegal.

I'm not sure what your position is Canidae.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:35 am
by Canidae
I'm saying you can paint many countries in this light and it seems like more America bashing, hence the need for counter balancing.
If you didn't think the American way doesn't include massacres and turning a blind eye to shit like that , contrary to their rosy prose about freedom and democracy, then you forgot what they did to the indians....

I don't think the pure ideals they espouse can exist in this world because you have to do as they do unto you before they do you in in this cruel world.

Mr. Loneys's plight as a hostage in Iraq is a good case in point.
His ideals and life were safe in Canada but mean shit in Iraq in the hands of those who won't play by those ideals.
He is dead unless there are others in control or influence over those who hold him play a political card and gain his release.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:40 am
by Hannibal
Reminds me of the flame-throwing rakes we sent Iraqi 'farmers' back in the day.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:42 am
by [xeno]Julios
Canidae wrote:I'm saying you can paint many countries in this light and it seems like more America bashing, hence the need for counter balancing.
If you didn't think the americans way doesn't include massacres and turning a blind eye to shit like that , contrary to their rosy prose about freedom and democracy then you forgot what they did to the indians....
fair enough.

It wasn't just the americans though in this case (although they seem to be centrally involved in that they provided direct training, diplomatic, and hardware support, which is basically proxy military):
The General Assembly continued to adopt similar resolutions on East Timor each year until 1982, but support for them declined. Both Dunn and Horta explain how the votes reflect the perceptions of different nations of their relations with Indonesia. India, they say, has drawn a false parallel with its own control of the former Portuguese colony of Goa and has supported Indonesia in part for this reason. The US, Japan, and Australia evidently believe that supporting Indonesia serves their own strategic and economic interests. Arab countries (except for Algeria) support Indonesia for reasons of Islamic solidarity. France, West Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden value their commercial interests with Indonesia. Yugoslavia prefers not to act against a fellow member of the Nonaligned Movement. The USSR supports resolutions on East Timor but avoids doing anything else so as not to disrupt its own relations with Indonesia. Several Eastern European governments abstain or do not vote at all in what Horta claims to be a private deal between Moscow and Jakarta.
http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/47254#1128503

(from the book: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/article ... le_id=4944 )

Also, note that a theme of the thread is the apparent gag on the media - here's a document that reveals the american gov't red handed at their contribution to hundreds of thousands of innocents, and only a handful of media sources are reporting it.

ffs even BBC isn't reporting this afaik.

I think that in itself is worthy of discussion

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:12 am
by [xeno]Julios

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:49 pm
by seremtan
Canidae wrote:THe US should have invaded and saved those Timorian! Must have been a Clark Kent moment, not a Superman one or perhaps the cape was in the cleaners...

WTF I'll bet representatives of the US and definitely the UK met Hitler before he invaded countries in Europe...does that make it their fault?

This topics smells...
an analogous case is iraq. iraq was left (by the US and others) to get on it with regards attacking iran (and killing kurds), but then was opposed in its invasion of kuwait by the same people who gave the nod to the iran attack.

it's convenient to say that a great power has agency in one place (when it's convenient to be an agent), but is helpless as a kitten in another (when it's convenient to be 'helpless'), but not very plausible when it's the same place in both cases.

i'm afraid the US is a victim of it's own superpower status. if it's a superpower then it has great influence over events. if it doesn't have that influence, how can it be superpower? you can't have it both ways

Re: Declassified documents - US backed East Timor massacres

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:37 pm
by Freakaloin
[xeno]Julios wrote:http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17 ... 98,00.html

yet only a handful of news sources reporting it:

http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=mo ... 9252&hl=en
THE US knew well in advance of and explicitly approved Indonesia's invasion of East Timor in 1975, newly declassified documents say.

Released this week by the independent Washington-based National Security Archive (NSA), the documents showed US officials were aware of the invasion plans nearly a year in advance.

They adopted a "policy of silence" and even sought to suppress news and discussions on East Timor, including credible reports of Indonesia's massacres of Timorese civilians, according to the documents.

East Timor is today an independent nation.

The people of East Timor voted in favour of breaking away from Indonesia in a UN-sponsored ballot in August 1999 before gaining full independence in May 2002 after more than two years of UN stewardship.

But the path to independence was bloody. Militia gangs reportedly directed by Indonesia's military went on a killing spree before and after the East Timorese referendum, killing about 1400 independence supporters.

Thirty years after the Indonesian invasion, the formerly secret US documents showed how multiple US administrations tried to conceal information on East Timor to avoid a controversy that would prompt a Congressional ban on weapons sales to Indonesia.

"I'm assuming you're really going to keep your mouth shut on the subject," then National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger told his staff in October 1975 in response to reports that Indonesia had begun its attack on East Timor.

The administration of President Gerald Ford knew that Indonesia had invaded East Timor using almost entirely US equipment, and that the use of that equipment for that purpose was illegal, the documents showed.

In 1977, officials of the administration of Ford's successor, Jimmy Carter, blocked declassification of an explosive cable transcribing President Ford and Secretary of State Kissinger's meeting with Indonesian President Suharto.

At the meeting in December 1975, they explicitly approved of the East Timor invasion, according to the documents.

Through the 1980s, US officials continued to receive -- and deny or dismiss -- credible reports of Indonesia's massacres of Timorese civilians.

The National Security Archive had provided more than 1000 formerly classified US documents to help an East Timorese commission of inquiry into human rights abuses that occurred between 1975 and 1999.

East Timor president Xanana Gusmao handed the commission's 2500-page report to the Timorese Parliament last Monday but wanted it withheld from the public, amid an outcry from opposition politicians and rights activists.

Brad Simpson, Director of the National Security Archive's Indonesia and East Timor documentation project, said he expected the commission's final report to show that Indonesia's invasion of East Timor and resulting crimes there "occurred in an international context in which the support of powerful nations, especially the US, was indispensable."

"These documents also point to the need for genuine international accountability for East Timor's suffering," he said.


like everyone already didn't know this already...