Page 1 of 2

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:06 am
by Grudge
sounds great

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:17 am
by mjrpes
It has Adrien Brody in it. His schnoz means instant win.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:15 pm
by Dr_Watson
you were expecting less?
peter jackson can't make a movie that takes less time than haling his fat ass up a flight of stairs.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:31 pm
by Grudge
Apparently he's lost 70 pounds since RotK.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:33 pm
by Deathshroud
Grudge wrote:Apparently he's lost 70 pounds since RotK.
You should see the pics of him in Sept? issue of Wired, he looks completely different.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:35 pm
by Mr.Magnetichead
Dr_Watson wrote:you were expecting less?
peter jackson can't make a movie that takes less time than haling his fat ass up a flight of stairs.
Hes a skinny fuck now.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:17 pm
by chopov
Image

:icon20: he looks like 20 years younger...

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:21 pm
by Mr.Magnetichead
And FAAAAAABULOUS!

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:08 pm
by Don Carlos
Mr.Magnetichead wrote:And FAAAAAABULOUS!
LOL

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 pm
by prince1000
i did not want to see this until i saw a preview in theaters last weekend. had no idea he was making it.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:11 pm
by MidnightQ4
The 3 LOTR movies are all in the top 15 of all time in the imdb. That's doing something if you ask me. I think we can expect great things from his movies. Kinda makes you wonder why the other directors out there turn out such garbage when all they need to do is study his movies and try and duplicate what he does.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:27 pm
by Deathshroud
MidnightQ4 wrote:The 3 LOTR movies are all in the top 15 of all time in the imdb. That's doing something if you ask me. I think we can expect great things from his movies. Kinda makes you wonder why the other directors out there turn out such garbage when all they need to do is study his movies and try and duplicate what he does.
Jackson kinda "lucked out" with those movies. Don't get me wrong, he is a great director, but the fact that he was given the opportunity to direct those movies automatically puts him way ahead.

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:37 pm
by o'dium
Yeah, and lets face it, how many followers were there that "needed" those movies?

So you have your whole geek world fanbase, PLUS the fact they are "not shit" films, PLUS the fact everybody said they were "the next big thing".

It was kinda hard for the LotR films NOT to suck in regards to sales.

Myself, I just dunno. I only really liked the first one. The other two just dragged like a grannies tits...

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:50 pm
by mjrpes
For the last two movies in LOTR, I find the Frodo/Sam/Gullum bits to be tedious and boring. I discovered if I skip ahead past those parts the action and pace of the film really improves. I also skip past the Treebeard parts, those are tedious as hell.

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:44 am
by Dukester
mjrpes wrote:For the last two movies in LOTR, I find the Frodo/Sam/Gullum bits to be tedious and boring. I discovered if I skip ahead past those parts the action and pace of the film really improves. I also skip past the Treebeard parts, those are tedious as hell.

Well said!

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:20 am
by Dr_Watson
chopov wrote:Image

:icon20: he looks like 20 years younger...
wow... money's been good to him.
sucks to be fran, now she's going to have to get pretty.

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:03 am
by ajerara
King Kong is gonna rule. Can't wait.

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:05 am
by Tormentius
ajerara wrote:King Kong is gonna rule. Can't wait.
Saw the preview last week. It looks like it could be good.

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:45 am
by mjrpes
My God, he looks like a whole new person. Good for him :icon14:

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:39 am
by SplishSplash
No shit, the LOTR movies would be fantastic if it weren't for those hobbits.

He should have left the hobbit parts out. (for serious, no sarcasm)

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:44 am
by MKJ
i liked the hobbits more than the sniveling faramir and riders of rohan crap actually

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:24 pm
by 4days
mjrpes wrote:For the last two movies in LOTR, I find the Frodo/Sam/Gullum bits to be tedious and boring. I discovered if I skip ahead past those parts the action and pace of the film really improves. I also skip past the Treebeard parts, those are tedious as hell.
that was what was so good about the book and where the dvd triumphs over seeing the movie at a cinema, you can miss out whole chapters.

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:07 pm
by dzjepp
Damn he turned into a skinny little hobbit - hair still looks like a bag of unwashed fuck though.

This movie is gonna own, jackson said this is the film he wanted to make his entire life, what inspired him to become a director. :up:

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:39 pm
by Nightshade
I saw Adrien Brody on the Daily Show the other night, he said the same about it being Jackson's inspiration. Also, I had no idea that there were dinosaurs in the original.
This looks to be more ownage...

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 12:38 am
by Dukester
Nightshade wrote:Also, I had no idea that there were dinosaurs in the original.
They just released the original on DVD like two weeks ago. If you have never see it, watch it before you see the new one. I think the new one is going to be great, but half the fun is going to be comparing it to the original.

That Dino De Laurentis thing was a fuckin joke :(