Quake3World

and now we are buying their spacecraft from them...its so obvious it never happened...

http://news.techwhack.com/2556/281107-n ... pacecraft/

NASA Denial! Apollo Denial! US Denial! Denial Denial....those-commie-bastards-dont-know-their -asses-from-a-hole-in-the-ground Denial!

lol - moon landing denial - fucking hell where do you buy your drugs -



MASS HALUCINATION SUFFERED BY ENTIRE PLANET

ALL POINTS THAT REFUTE MOON LANDING DISPROVED ENDLESSLY WITHOUT QUESTION

HOUSE HUNSBAND FROM USA DREAMS OF WATCHING UK MEDIA SO HE DOESN'T HAVE TO TRAWL PARANOID BLOGS TO ASSESS FACTS OF MOST MATTERS ..

lol

i'll believe it when i see the remains of the other lunar missions...as long as the footage hasn't been doctored...

This can be settled quite easily.

All we need to do is just point one of our super duper telescopes at the moon landing site and get some footage of the flag, rover, etc that are still there on the moon.

Case closed.

I do not believe the US landed on the moon when they said they did either.

MidnightQ4 wrote:This can be settled quite easily.

All we need to do is just point one of our super duper telescopes at the moon landing site and get some footage of the flag, rover, etc that are still there on the moon.

Case closed.

YEAH WELL THEY TRIED TWICE AND COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING...HMMMMM...

Freakaloin wrote:...as long as the footage hasn't been doctored...

youll never know that do you. especially if you wear a tinfoil hat 24/7

Freakaloin wrote:

MidnightQ4 wrote:This can be settled quite easily.

All we need to do is just point one of our super duper telescopes at the moon landing site and get some footage of the flag, rover, etc that are still there on the moon.

Case closed.

YEAH WELL THEY TRIED TWICE AND COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING...HMMMMM...

that's because the flag, rover and everything else on the moon have been taken by the moonians to their secret laboratories to analyse the earthlings possessions.

belgium landed on the moon in 1875 anyway. there are lithographs that PROOVE ITZ0RS

Why don't someone that has authority with the Hubble telescope try using it to scan the moon to find the American flag?

Because that would clearly be a doctored image...

pete wrote:Why don't someone that has authority with the Hubble telescope try using it to scan the moon to find the American flag?

I think I read or heard somewhere that the hubble, although it can take images billions of miles away, can't focus clearly for short distance objects, such as details on the surface of the moon. I guess it's long sighted
I'm pretty sure I heard that, but I might be talking out of my arse as well.

As I've told you dinks before, it would take a telescope with a one hundred and fifteen meter primary mirror to resolve something the size of the moon rover. Now SHUT THE FUCK UP.

a one hundred and fifteen meter primary mirror is ok, if thats all you can afford

Nightshade wrote:As I've told you dinks before, it would take a telescope with a one hundred and fifteen meter primary mirror to resolve something the size of the moon rover. Now SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Sorry but I call bullshit :icon32: . Where is the math to back this up? Most mirrors today are around 7-9 feet across if I'm not mistaken, and these can see object billions of lightyears away. I'd say their resolving power is quite high. I did however read an article recently about a new system using many smaller mirrors together all refocused continuously, which will be something like 35 meters across, and should be able to see things all the way back to the beginning of time (aka the big bang). In other words it should be able to observe the most distant objects in the universe.

you fucking knob. the things they're looking at that far away are GALAXIES. do you have any concept of how much bigger a galaxy is than a lunar rover? no. because people don't think in numbers that FUCKING BIG.
and the math is basic optics. if you need someone to do it for you, go back to the 16th century or freshman physics... whichever seems easier.

um, the hubble which is by all accounts not even a top telescope anymore can see planets around stars light years away. I know that a 4 meter vehicle on the moon is extremely small, but our telescopes these days are pretty bad ass though too.

no, it can not. it can detaect evidence of planets around distant stars by observing the effects of their gravity on their stars (the stars wobble). you know shit, and nasa isn't going to build a gigantic telescope with nada focal distance just to prove their own mission. if you're stupid enough to not believe they landed on the moon, you're too stupid to believe their pictures. personally, i think you've proven yourself in two posts to be exactly that stupid. time to cut your losses?

hahaha, I just wanted to see what you would say rofl. gg.

LOL menkent, was it your turn in the barrel today or something?

R00k wrote:LOL menkent, was it your turn in the barrel today or something?

Jesus, I just heard that joke for the first time at work today. Lol.

freakaloin you are a commie.

i've seen people post some amazingly retarded shit on here and truly believe it. one can never underestimate the willfulness of a retard.

menkent wrote:no, it can not. it can detaect evidence of planets around distant stars by observing the effects of their gravity on their stars (the stars wobble). you know shit, and nasa isn't going to build a gigantic telescope with nada focal distance just to prove their own mission. if you're stupid enough to not believe they landed on the moon, you're too stupid to believe their pictures. personally, i think you've proven yourself in two posts to be exactly that stupid. time to cut your losses?

moron alert???...