Some new stock pictures
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:44 am
What do you guys think?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:45 am
very, very nice
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:45 am
iNice
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:46 am
well done.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:47 am
the bottom one looks like a lamp that has seen its day..
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:10 am
wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:11 am
:icon26:mjrpes wrote:iNice
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:11 am
For further information in reguards to this, please follow the link provided. thank you.SoM wrote:wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button
http://quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12365
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 3:22 am
It's a little bit more to it than that... and the outcome is very iNice.SoM wrote:wow, someone pointed a camera at an object and pressed a button
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:15 am
Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:22 am
I only see 2 pics.andyman wrote:Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?
How can some of them be blurry?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:24 am
both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:29 am
LMFAO[xeno]Julios wrote:I only see 2 pics.andyman wrote:Some of the pics are blurry...is it supposed to be like that?
How can some of them be blurry?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:43 am
That's unavoidable, I assume, as the focus point is set to the front of the object, which means anything in front of or behind it will turn blurry.andyman wrote:both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:44 am
Yes, its called depth of field and they're supposed to be like that.andyman wrote:both hav ethe back end of the item in the picture blurry (?)
Thanks for the good comments guys
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:37 am
I like the second one a lot.
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:13 am
boring