Page 1 of 1
F.E.A.R review.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:36 pm
by reefsurfer
http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html
"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.
9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.
9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.
9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.
9.2 OVERALL out of 10"
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:43 pm
by Chupacabra
what a terrible name
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:43 pm
by o'dium
Chupacabra wrote:what a terrible name
Yes but...
"what a fantastic game."
Loved the demo, cant wait.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:07 pm
by Freakaloin
old...
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:10 pm
by [FTF]Pyro
Chupacabra wrote:what a terrible name
Re: F.E.A.R review.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:10 pm
by [FTF]Pyro
reefsurfer wrote:http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html
"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.
9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.
9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.
9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.
9.2 OVERALL out of 10"
I wouldnt trust IGN with a review....... ever.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:12 pm
by o'dium
Ahh shut up... Look at Quake, ohhhhhh, thats really a name that had thought put into it. At least Quake 1 had a point to being called Quake, what did Quake 2/3/4 have to do with it
Dont judge a book by its cover
If you didn't like that demo, fine, your loss.
Re: F.E.A.R review.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:12 pm
by o'dium
[FTF]Pyro wrote:reefsurfer wrote:http://pc.ign.com/articles/657/657310p1.html
"9.0 Presentation
Excellent production values, but a few holes persist.
9.5 Graphics
It doesn't get much better than this, and the bevy of options make things highly customizable to your rig's capabilities.
9.5 Sound
Gorgeous music, spooky ambient sound, and great sound effects abound.
9.2 Gameplay
Challenging combat, great set pieces, detailed environments, but not a lot of environmental variety.
8.0 Lasting Appeal
The main game is relatively short; multiplayer, while having some neat tricks up its sleeve, won't replace Counter-Strike any time soon.
9.2 OVERALL out of 10"
I wouldnt trust IGN with a review....... ever.
Theres always PC Gamer.
What did they give this one, -17%?
"yeah, well this game has guns. Everybody knows HL2 has guns so shy did they bother? That sucks."
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:14 pm
by shiznit
Fear was fun online.
[lvlshot]http://img319.imageshack.us/img319/879/feardi018mx.jpg[/lvlshot]
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:01 pm
by reefsurfer
shiznit wrote:Fear was fun online.
[lvlshot]http://img319.imageshack.us/img319/879/feardi018mx.jpg[/lvlshot]
I bet it was looser.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:09 pm
by shiznit
I found that image...notice the tag at the bottom.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:18 pm
by reefsurfer
shiznit wrote:I found that image...notice the tag at the bottom.
Thats what they always say cheater...