Halo 3
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:03 pm
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:04 pm
Gun doesn't look very Halo. Engine appears to be Doom 3.
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:05 pm
What? Its the SMG out of Halo 2, exactly the sameFoo wrote:Gun doesn't look very Halo. Engine appears to be Doom 3.
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:07 pm
In fact... This is exactly the same pic, lol... Fake?
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:09 pm
lol, busted
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:13 pm
Yeah it's fake
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:14 pm
Doomer, do you think so¿
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 10:22 pm
Shoot, They never finished Halo 2.
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 11:03 pm
impressive like bread.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:54 am
The main thing that discredits that photo is the gun and its position and the fact that it doesn't seem very Halo like. However I agree with the statement in that article that even if Bungie is working on Halo 3 that MS wouldn't want any news as it would most likely hurt the launch titles.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:00 am
this was already denounced.
apparantly it was made by some bloke on the gamespot forums.
apparantly it was made by some bloke on the gamespot forums.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:35 am
Halo 2 will be re-released for 360 this spring, including a "proper" ending. Halo 3 won't be along untill 2007 or 2008, to boost the 360 towards the end of it's lifetime, just like Halo 2 did a year ago for the xbox.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:25 am
a rumour, still.Grudge wrote:Halo 2 will be re-released for 360 this spring, including a "proper" ending. Halo 3 won't be along untill 2007 or 2008, to boost the 360 towards the end of it's lifetime, just like Halo 2 did a year ago for the xbox.
this week bungie will make their "grand announcement" (not halo3) though.
i tihnk its too early for remakes. i mean really
if they wanted to release a new ending, just make it for xbox1
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:35 am
I seriously doubt that Halo 3 will be released for 360 'towards the end of it's lifetime'.
That just flat out doesn't make any sense.
That just flat out doesn't make any sense.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:38 am
h2 wasnt released at the end of the xbox1's lifetime. that tihng has a lot of life left in him. its more a middle-lifetime release IMO
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:41 am
In one of the interviews a Bungie designer said that they were going to end Halo 2 like that regardless of how much time they had, what was cut due to time were levels in the middle. I think Bungie would do well to release a non-Halo game before releasing Halo 3.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:58 am
Why is it that nerds can't understand a cliffhanger ending? Halo 2 ends ike that because Bungie wanted it to
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:13 pm
i just finished halo4..sucked...questions?
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:23 pm
w3rd, if you check out the making of dvd you'll see the stuff that got cut due to time restraints. a fight between the arbiter and one of the prophets, for instance, and some maps on another one of those floating citiesGeebs wrote:Why is it that nerds can't understand a cliffhanger ending? Halo 2 ends ike that because Bungie wanted it to
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:38 pm
And the fully per pixel engine with lighting and shadowing to match Doom 3 as well as real time reflections on his VISOR!MKJ wrote:w3rd, if you check out the making of dvd you'll see the stuff that got cut due to time restraints. a fight between the arbiter and one of the prophets, for instance, and some maps on another one of those floating citiesGeebs wrote:Why is it that nerds can't understand a cliffhanger ending? Halo 2 ends ike that because Bungie wanted it to
I saw that and shit myself lol, it was so good "IT DOES LOOK THIS GOOD!" they said. Lol.
Anyways, the end product looked amazing regardless. A good used of bloom, for once. Its just a sad shame it lost that "halo" feeling. Maybe it was the weapons
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:52 pm
actually, it was how they wanted it to look. maybe that clip was real time, who knows. there wasnt much going on other than a narrow corridor and the MC. for a full game, however, there really wasnt enough gpu powero'dium wrote:And the fully per pixel engine with lighting and shadowing to match Doom 3 as well as real time reflections on his VISOR!MKJ wrote:w3rd, if you check out the making of dvd you'll see the stuff that got cut due to time restraints. a fight between the arbiter and one of the prophets, for instance, and some maps on another one of those floating citiesGeebs wrote:Why is it that nerds can't understand a cliffhanger ending? Halo 2 ends ike that because Bungie wanted it to
I saw that and shit myself lol, it was so good "IT DOES LOOK THIS GOOD!" they said. Lol.
Anyways, the end product looked amazing regardless. A good used of bloom, for once. Its just a sad shame it lost that "halo" feeling. Maybe it was the weapons
(see dvd for more info :P
)Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:54 pm
Yeah I have the SE DVD in the nice tin too. I think thats how all big name games should ship 
A tin, making of DVD and the game. The Doom 3 one lacks the DVD but damn, the case beats the shit out of the 1 inch wide DVD box we got on PC
I know the box wouldn't be able to pump out the detail, maybe for halo 3. We shall see.
A tin, making of DVD and the game. The Doom 3 one lacks the DVD but damn, the case beats the shit out of the 1 inch wide DVD box we got on PC
I know the box wouldn't be able to pump out the detail, maybe for halo 3. We shall see.
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:23 pm
That is what I keep telling people. That was the best damned cliffhanger ever, and thus I hated and loved it. I loved it because it was a damn good cliffhanger and I hated it because I wanted to see what happens next. Which is the point of a cliffhanger. It does get annoying when some dumbass thinks that the game was "unfinished" because of itGeebs wrote:Why is it that nerds can't understand a cliffhanger ending? Halo 2 ends ike that because Bungie wanted it to