Quake3World

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:41 pm**

guess that doesn't apply nemore...

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/10 ... aw-by.html

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:09 pm**

lol, as if the privately-owned media weren't already providing enough "covert propaganda" for free they have to do this

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:27 pm**

Good old blogs...what a great source of news!

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:54 pm**

so ur saying getting the news from the msm is a better source? rofl...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:55 pm**

btw moron...that blogs source for that story is the nytimes...

rofl..idiot...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:56 pm**

Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!

in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:08 pm**

glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

hence canis is a moron...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:12 pm**

Freakaloin, what have we all let you konow about the moron bell?

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:13 pm**

Canis wrote:Freakaloin, what have we all let you konow about the moron bell?

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:14 pm**

glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)

I never said it was incorrect at all...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:15 pm**

but u did say u were a moron...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:26 pm**

lol, brazilian

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:42 pm**

Canis wrote:
glossy wrote:
Canis wrote:Good old blogs...what a great source of news!
in fact, the entire point of the article is that normal news networks had a slanted article written by and for the bush administration, then was inserted into the media with no clues toward who the author was (or the author's intentions)
I never said it was incorrect at all...

didn't say you were, I was just pointing out the irony, in case you hadn't read the article. Freakaloin is the one doing all the trolling here

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:18 pm**

Freakaloin wrote:so ur saying getting the news from the msm is a better source? rofl...

Freakaloin wrote:btw moron...that blogs source for that story is the nytimes...

rofl..idiot...

i like how u contradict ur self here...moron..?

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:28 pm**

well i only contradicted myself to show the absurdity of canis argument...any other questions?

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:30 pm**

lots of noobs round here..school's out??

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:45 pm**

I had no argument. I mearly mentioned the moron bell was ringing again. That alarm to you is like smoke to a smoke detector...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:10 pm**

ur even too stoopid to realize u did have an argument...rofl...

Posted: **Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:42 pm**

Duhard wrote:lots of noobs round here..school's out??

why - you cruising for a piece of ass?

Quake3World

member the good ole days when breaking the law meant jail?

member the good ole days when breaking the law meant jail?