Quake3World

xer0s wrote:The Dark Knight Rises 9/10
... I loved it. Thought it was fucking awesome.

The dark night rises, ok I guess 8/10 should have a little more 'summer action' puff.

The Dark Knight Rises was fucking awesome.

The Dark Knight Rises - 9/10

Took a point off because the movie ended

Looking forward to the sequels though.

The Dark Knight Rises = 9/10 - A terrific way to end the series (until the next reboot...which is probably already being worked on by some hack) and will be the last superhero movie I ever watch. Thank fucking God for that.

No other comic hero movie or series-of-movies has come close to the quality of Nolan's Batman movies and I'm betting they never will. Fuck Ironman 3, fuck the Avengers 2, fuck Spiderman 5 and - with the full force of my pelvis - fuck all future superhero movies in the ear.

Iron Sky was terrible :(

Damn. Maybe I should go see TDKR

Edit:

Looking forward to this film: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender's_Game_(film).

It should be rated "R" in order to be good. But, it probably won't.

phantasmagoria wrote:Iron Sky was terrible

I guess I had some really good weed when I watched it.

I watched The Dark Knight Rises again

sketch or it didn't happen

TruthfulLiar wrote:Looking forward to this film: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ender's_Game_(film).
It should be rated "R" in order to be good. But, it probably won't.

and here's why i'm really not looking forward to it (well, not beyond morbid curiosity):

Gavin Hood (born 12 May 1963) is a South African filmmaker, screenwriter, producer and actor, best known for writing and directing the Academy Award-winning Foreign Language Film Tsotsi (2005). He is the director of the 20th Century Fox film X-Men Origins: Wolverine, released on 1 May 2009.

The author rejected many directors on the grounds of wanting "someone who could do make the film right". And this.

Still. Kind of have to see it.

i guess i should be fair and mention that most of what i read on the interwebs about Hood blamed fox for the travesty that that "wolverine" movie turned into. before that he had a good reputation, so maybe OSC being anal about keeping the studios' filth away from Ender and giving Hood some actual creative control might work out for the best? casting looks promising.

Captain Mazda wrote:batman pic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHhzD2XEoWA

AI

Haven't seen for a while but a good view all the same so grab it

wiki

Just remember the line (if you can) to a beautiful movie.... “Cirrus, Socrates, Particle, Decibel, Hurricane, Dolphin, Tulip"

9/10

Good catch. A bit cold and disconnected in its feel, but I really liked it. Sbeen years since I've seen it so I might give it another view

FRACTURE

Another good one if you get the time. Just watched for the first time, surely not my last

Simply a great role played by the two lead roles and those be, Anthony Hopkins as Ted Crawford and Ryan Gosling as Willy Beachum.



Nice thriller 8/10
wiki

The Dark Knight Rises - 9/10

I possibly like this more than The Dark Knight...

Oh yeah...I forgot to mention: I saw Prometheus once more before they removed it from the IMAX 3D. Rather than wanting to see the movie again, it was actually an experiment to compare it to the regular theatre when I saw it the first time. I felt it was the perfect opportunity for me to see insanely beautiful sci-fi visuals in the supposed "highest caliber" without having to duck, because Ridley Scott isn't retarded enough to exploit the 3D as other directors would.

Besides the fact that at one point I couldn't wait for the movie to end, I've decided that I won't be seeing anything in 3D again, including TDKR.

I've concluded that 3D is an effect that is there to simpy enhance the effect of how things move in 3D space rather than how they look. Anything that moves in a 3D movie looks horrible with the blurriness and the streaking. Therefore, since any visual advantage of the 3D effect is actually detrimental to viewing, I've decided to stop defending 3D as part of an "immersive" movie experience that other snobs such as myself hoped it would be, and simply state that it's a gimmick that adds nothing visual and only seeks to convert the movie going experience into a theme park ride. So, in closing, the 3D effect is only there to make audiences duck in their seats.

Fuck 3D.

you wont be seeing TDKR in 3D? how unique.

fuck u...

plus, you think those glasses go through some kind of cleaning process before they end up on your face from the previous 500 disgusting fucks that use them?
They just go from the return bin, back to circulation. I bet both of my nuts on that.

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Oh yeah...I forgot to mention: I saw Prometheus once more before they removed it from the IMAX 3D. Rather than wanting to see the movie again, it was actually an experiment to compare it to the regular theatre when I saw it the first time. I felt it was the perfect opportunity for me to see insanely beautiful sci-fi visuals in the supposed "highest caliber" without having to duck, because Ridley Scott isn't retarded enough to exploit the 3D as other directors would.

Besides the fact that at one point I couldn't wait for the movie to end, I've decided that I won't be seeing anything in 3D again, including TDKR.

I've concluded that 3D is an effect that is there to simpy enhance the effect of how things move in 3D space rather than how they look. Anything that moves in a 3D movie looks horrible with the blurriness and the streaking. Therefore, since any visual advantage of the 3D effect is actually detrimental to viewing, I've decided to stop defending 3D as part of an "immersive" movie experience that other snobs such as myself hoped it would be, and simply state that it's a gimmick that adds nothing visual and only seeks to convert the movie going experience into a theme park ride. So, in closing, the 3D effect is only there to make audiences duck in their seats.

Fuck 3D.

I saw TDKR in imax non-3D. U mad bro?