Quake3World

You stink...

makes u want to throw a costco door mat over a section to serve as a door for them!

i wonder if theyre smart enough to use it?

the deers i mean ey

xer0s wrote:You stink...

yea sometimes i stink it is true

i have been known to change my v neck undershirt many times a day!

plained wrote:

losCHUNK wrote:Wonder if gwamps is ok with animal abuse

whoa ey!

what makes you say something like that?

the guy most def doesnt seem like he would be ok with that at all imo

it is ok to disagree with the guy and have your own opinions but i think throwing that type of shit around just stinks!

What ?, we all know he used to shag one...

plained wrote:

losCHUNK wrote:Wonder if gwamps is ok with animal abuse

whoa ey!

what makes you say something like that?

the guy most def doesnt seem like he would be ok with that at all imo

it is ok to disagree with the guy and have your own opinions but i think throwing that type of shit around just stinks!

Just ignore him, he's upset.

YourGrandpa wrote:I think some of the children here have weak stomachs, so they determined that no one else could handle seeing the photos.

the actual reason they were removed has already been explained to you, Brian. stop being dumb

The reason was BS. You and I both know it. Quit being such a rube, simpletan.

We all know it's a retarded rule, but you seem to be the only one not able to process the fact that we need to abide by it anyway. It's not a matter of whether the community here can handle it.

I think it was a horrible post and I was one of the people that reported it

Transient wrote:We all know it's a retarded rule, but you seem to be the only one not able to process the fact that we need to abide by it anyway. It's not a matter of whether the community here can handle it.

I understand the rule. I also understand the rule is "DISCRETIONARY". That means it up to someone to make a decision as to whether or not something goes over the line. So I'm not taking issue with the rule, it's the individual's discretion. I truly don't think anyone from id would be upset if pictures of a deer that killed itself were posted here. Instead the pictures were unnecessarily removed by one person who chose to impose his moral/emotional judgement over others. But I guess as long as you're okay with the people and the choices they make for you, you'll be okay. Just don't be surprised when others who don't agree have their say.

Tell that to your mambipambi friends. They're having trouble with it.

If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.

Don Carlos wrote:I think it was a horrible post and I was one of the people that reported it

... pathetic...

YourGrandpa wrote:I understand the rule. I also understand the rule is "DISCRETIONARY". That means it up to someone to make a decision as to whether or not something goes over the line. So I'm not taking issue with the rule, it's the individual's discretion. I truly don't think anyone from id would be upset if pictures of a deer that killed itself were posted here. Instead the pictures were unnecessarily removed by one person who chose to impose his moral/emotional judgement over others. But I guess as long as you're okay with the people and the choices they make for you, you'll be okay. Just don't be surprised when others who don't agree have their say.

holy shit you don't even understand how rules work

thank fuck you're not a lawyer. you'd be laughed out of court - for this, and because of your giant, stupid head

Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.

That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.

seremtan wrote:holy shit you don't even understand how rules work

thank fuck you're not a lawyer. you'd be laughed out of court - for this, and because of your giant, stupid head

I explained exactly how the rule works. Tell me how the "rule" isn't discretionary.

YourGrandpa wrote:

Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.

That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.

Actually it makes perfect sense. I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.
They are both not allowed but one is far more graphic than the other in nature. You are saying that the dead deer is nature at work, well so are tits. Nothing more natural that the things used to feed the young of this world. Yet you argue for the animal post to remain and we are all pussies for not wanting to see it or it being allowed.

I would also say that this has something to do with me. I like animals more than 99% of humans, so I do find that sort of shit upsetting.

YourGrandpa wrote:I explained exactly how the rule works. Tell me how the "rule" isn't discretionary.

You explained how you *think* the rule works. If you think id would be ok with an image of an eviscerated animal being posted on their forums, I'd like to hear your reasoning. Or maybe some examples from other companies' websites. Would Bethesda be cool with those pics, I wonder?

Don Carlos wrote:I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.

And people would agree with you anywhere other than America, I'm sure.

I think everyone should go back and read this entire thread. Note how completely retarded it is...

Don Carlos wrote: Actually it makes perfect sense. I would argue, quite legitimately, that a set of tits is far less offensive than a gore filled, dead pregnant animal post.
They are both not allowed but one is far more graphic than the other in nature. You are saying that the dead deer is nature at work, well so are tits. Nothing more natural that the things used to feed the young of this world. Yet you argue for the animal post to remain and we are all pussies for not wanting to see it or it being allowed.

I would also say that this has something to do with me. I like animals more than 99% of humans, so I do find that sort of shit upsetting.

Dead animals and tits are two entirely different things. The only thing they have in common is YOUR sense of what is offensive. And if you are truly traumatized at the site of either one or have difficulty distinguishing the two, I don't want YOU making decisions for me.

YourGrandpa wrote:Dead animals and tits are two entirely different things.

quote for the day

Transient wrote:You explained how you *think* the rule works. If you think id would be ok with an image of an eviscerated animal being posted on their forums, I'd like to hear your reasoning. Or maybe some examples from other companies' websites. Would Bethesda be cool with those pics, I wonder?

Again, I explained exactly how the rule works. You still haven't told me how the "rule" isn't discretionary. And I'm sure in a different context an eviscerated animal might be offensive. But this deer offed itself in a nature versus civilization type accident. There was no ill intent, no abuse, no torture. Simply documentation of the event. Therefore it shouldn't be considered "offensive".

YourGrandpa wrote:

Don Carlos wrote:If we can't post tits we shouldn't be allowed to post the bloody and tragic death of a deer who had tried to give birth and ripped herself open on a slack jawed idiots fence, you squared headed bellend.

That makes absolutely no sense at all. That's like saying if we can't murder people, we shouldn't be able to watch porn. You're comparing apples and oranges, you dense waste of oxygen.

It's very simple for most people. This is a open forum for people of most ages, posting gore isn't allowed. What can't you grasp about that?

Oh yeah, edited twice. Lol.

seremtan wrote:quote for the day

I guess you gave up on the last statement. Wise choice.